/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Google and UCB researchers detail “inference-time search”, which some call a fourth AI scaling law, though experts are skeptical of its usefulness in many cases

But Can It Deliver? Eric Zhao : Why We Can't Escape Brute-Force Search Bluesky: Dave Lee / @davelee.me : An AI that adds “but there's reason to be skeptical” to the end of every sentence in a story about AI [embedded post] X: Ethan Mollick / @emollick : So it looks like there's a third scaling law: you can make models better by training them with more compute, by having them “think” for longer about an answer, or by generating large numbers of answers in parallel and picking good ones. Each might be increased independently. Eric Zhao / @ericzhao28 : Thinking for longer (e.g. o1) is only one of many axes of test-time compute. In a new @Google_AI paper, we instead focus on scaling the search axis. By just randomly sampling 200x & self-verifying, Gemini 1.5 ➡️ o1 performance. The secret: self-verification is easier at scale! [image]

TechCrunch Kyle Wiggers

Discussion

  • @davelee.me Dave Lee on bluesky
    An AI that adds “but there's reason to be skeptical” to the end of every sentence in a story about AI [embedded post]
  • @emollick Ethan Mollick on x
    So it looks like there's a third scaling law: you can make models better by training them with more compute, by having them “think” for longer about an answer, or by generating large numbers of answers in parallel and picking good ones. Each might be increased independently.
  • @ericzhao28 Eric Zhao on x
    Thinking for longer (e.g. o1) is only one of many axes of test-time compute. In a new @Google_AI paper, we instead focus on scaling the search axis. By just randomly sampling 200x & self-verifying, Gemini 1.5 ➡️ o1 performance. The secret: self-verification is easier at scale! [i…