/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Google releases its proposal for the White House's AI Action Plan, arguing that “fair use and text-and-data mining exceptions” are “critical” to AI development

Google, following on the heels of OpenAI, published a policy proposal in response to the Trump Administration's call for a national “AI Action Plan.”

TechCrunch Kyle Wiggers

Discussion

  • @scottsantens.com Scott Santens on bluesky
    It was always inevitable that AI would be trained on all our work whether we liked it or not.  There's too much money at stake in this.  It's also always been inevitable that job displacement will happen.  We have to make sure that AI works for all of us via universal basic incom…
  • @richardlittler Richard Littler on bluesky
    “Art thief declares race to accumulate stolen artworks “over” if stealing from art galleries and people's private homes isn't fair”  —  arstechnica.com/tech-policy/ ...
  • @the-jaguarr @the-jaguarr on bluesky
    AI itself could potentially be a wonderful thing if it were being developed by ethical, thoughtful, smart people who believed in the betterment of all.  But it's not.  Not in the slightest.  Quite the opposite, really.  —  arstechnica.com/tech-policy/ ...
  • @max.is.a.cutie.fyi @max.is.a.cutie.fyi on bluesky
    google be like: let us be evil, let us steal other people's content in peace, it's for “science”  —  :/ [embedded post]
  • r/agi r on reddit
    OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn't fair use
  • r/singularity r on reddit
    OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn't fair use: Ars Technica
  • @ruslantrad Ruslan Trad on bluesky
    “OpenAI describes Chinese AI lab DeepSeek as “state-subsidized” and “state-controlled,” and recommends that the U.S. government consider banning models from the outfit and similar People's Republic of China (PRC)-supported operations.”
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on bluesky
    If you can't compete with them, ban them.
  • @lukaszolejnik Lukasz Olejnik on bluesky
    It's of course not true that the use of DeepSeek model is risky for user privacy.  Such models can be hosted and run in any country in the world-including in the U.S. or the EU, or even on a user's computer, locally.  [embedded post]
  • @FSonder@mastodon.ie Frank Sonderborg on mastodon
    Not fair, not fair at all.  Coming over here and getting better results with cheaper equipment.  Stealing our stolen data with out even asking us;-O  —  https://techcrunch.com/...
  • @vishvanands Vishvanand Subramanian on threads
    trying hard to steelman this position from openai but unless it's possible to hide malware in the model weights, what exactly is the risk of downloading open source models from china?  apart from the obvious risk to openai trying to charge 2000 a month for a product deepseek will…
  • @parkert Parker Thompson on threads
    Presumably they mean the SaaS product, which you definitely shouldn't give any sensitive data to.  —  The open source product is cool, partially because Chinese censorship and American censorship are very different so they can do complimentary things.  And good luck banning that.…
  • @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x
    I cannot overstate how terrible the vibes are in @OpenAI 's submission. Their statement is basically vice signaling throughout.
  • @peterwildeford Peter Wildeford on x
    The @AnthropicAI and @OpenAI submissions to the US gov have different vibes about the seriousness of risks and how the US government should react to them Anthropic: if there's large biorisk, mandate testing OpenAI: incentivize voluntary testing through offering govt contracts [im…
  • @xlr8harder @xlr8harder on x
    Hi OpenAI friends, you should feel bad about this
  • @deliprao @deliprao on x
    I have never seen a company and a CEO more insecure than this
  • @kalomaze @kalomaze on x
    ah, so when a chinese company publishes their production codebases & models under permissive licenses, only then should you cry about foul play. really provocative technique they are going with here
  • @dorialexander Alexander Doria on x
    This will fare very well in Europe.
  • @andrewcurran_ Andrew Curran on x
    They also argue for banning the use of PRC-produced models within Tier 1 countries that ‘violate user privacy and create security risks such as the risk of IP theft.’ This is an anti-Whale harpoon. [image]
  • @josephjacks_ @josephjacks_ on x
    OpenAI definitely doesn't distill. OpenAI definitely doesn't train on copyrighted data. OpenAI definitely doesn't want to ban competition. OpenAI definitely wants what's best for humanity. OpenAI is the best AI and the most aligned AI and everything is awesome.
  • @thenormanmu Norman Mu on x
    pretty disingenuous to conflate the R1 model with the web chat app. from the proposal: [image]
  • @kimmonismus @kimmonismus on x
    Wow. How the mighty have fallen.
  • r/stupidpol r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models
  • r/DeepSeek r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models
  • r/accelerate r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models.
  • r/ChatGPT r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models
  • r/China r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models
  • r/singularity r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models
  • r/technology r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models
  • r/artificial r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models
  • r/LocalLLaMA r on reddit
    OpenAI calls DeepSeek ‘state-controlled,’ calls for bans on ‘PRC-produced’ models |  TechCrunch