/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Israeli startup Quantum Machines, which offers hardware tools to other quantum computing companies, raised a $170M Series C led by PSG Equity

Quantum computing remains a holy grail in the world of technology, but with some important breakthroughs in the last several months …

TechCrunch Ingrid Lunden

Context & Ripple Effects

Quantum Machines’ new round follows its earlier $17.5M financing in 2020 and a $50M Series B in 2021, extending a funding arc around hardware-and-software tooling rather than a single quantum-computing architecture.

Related coverage also includes Israeli companies pursuing other layers of the field, from Quantum Source’s photonic-computer effort to Classiq’s application-development tools. That makes Quantum Machines’ financing relevant as capital spreads across the quantum systems stack.

First-order effects

  • Quantum Machines gains $170M of new financing to support its hardware-tool business and its relationships with quantum-computing companies.
  • PSG Equity becomes the lead investor in a substantially larger round than Quantum Machines’ prior disclosed financings, giving the company a stronger financial base for its next stage.

Second-order effects

  • Competing quantum-control and orchestration vendors face a higher capital and execution benchmark, particularly where customers want tooling that can work across differing quantum hardware approaches.
  • The round reinforces the value of suppliers that sit between quantum processors and end users, complementing adjacent developer-tool efforts such as Classiq’s quantum application platform.

Third-order effects

  • If follow-on funding continues to favor control, orchestration, and software layers, value creation in quantum may increasingly accrue to interoperable systems suppliers rather than only to companies building processors.
  • Larger growth rounds could concentrate the quantum tooling market around a smaller number of well-funded platforms, though adoption will still depend on progress by the hardware companies they serve.

The trend: Quantum investment is broadening from bets on individual processors toward the enabling control, orchestration, and software layers needed to make diverse quantum hardware usable.

Discussion

  • @ingridlunden Ingrid on x
    Great to have a chance to talk Itamar Sivan, the CEO who rarely gives interviews. I am fascinated by the heartbeat of hope in quantum computing — smart people just plugging away at an idea (and not building for the sake of currency speculation or whatever).