/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Tel Aviv- and New York-based Blockaid, which offers crypto security tools, raised a $50M Series B led by Ribbit and says it stopped 71M attacks in 2024

Suvashree Ghosh / Bloomberg :

Bloomberg Suvashree Ghosh

Context & Ripple Effects

Blockaid’s $50M round follows its earlier seed and Series A financing for Web3 fraud, phishing, and hack protection, showing continued investor backing for a company focused specifically on transaction- and wallet-facing crypto risk.

The reported 71M attacks stopped in 2024 gives the funding announcement an operating-scale claim, not just a product-development narrative. It matters because crypto-security vendors increasingly compete on their ability to prevent threats in real time.

First-order effects

  • Blockaid gains $50M in new capital, with Ribbit as lead investor, to support its crypto-security business and signal investor conviction in its prevention-focused approach.
  • The company’s reported 2024 attack volume becomes a central proof point for customers and partners evaluating its tools.

Second-order effects

  • The round raises pressure on adjacent crypto-risk vendors, including DeFi threat-monitoring provider Solidus Labs, to differentiate through coverage, prevention capabilities, or customer traction.
  • Crypto companies evaluating security tooling may place more weight on demonstrable prevention outcomes rather than broad assurances of monitoring or compliance support.

Third-order effects

  • If prevention metrics become a consistent basis for funding and procurement, crypto security could consolidate around platforms embedded closer to user transactions and operational workflows.
  • The broader market may separate vendors that merely identify risk from those able to intervene before losses occur, though comparable vendor-reported attack figures will remain difficult to standardize.

The trend: Crypto security is shifting from post-incident monitoring toward real-time, prevention-oriented infrastructure backed by larger growth rounds.