/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

The EC releases its prohibited AI practices guidelines under the EU's AI Act, like using AI to track employees' emotions or to manipulate app and website users

Foo Yun Chee / Reuters :

Reuters Foo Yun Chee

Context & Ripple Effects

The Commission’s guidance is a concrete step in an EU policy arc that began with ethical AI principles centered on accountability, privacy, and bias and moved toward a rulebook for designated high-risk uses in the original AI Act proposal.

It matters because it translates the Act’s most categorical boundary—prohibited uses—into operational guidance for employers and digital-product operators, rather than leaving those limits as broad legislative language.

First-order effects

  • Employers and providers of workplace AI must reassess tools that infer or monitor workers’ emotions, while app and website operators must review AI-driven user-manipulation features against the Commission’s guidance.
  • Compliance, legal, and product teams gain a clearer reference point for deciding which planned AI deployments should be halted, redesigned, or kept out of the EU market.

Second-order effects

  • Vendors selling emotion-analysis, behavioral targeting, and engagement-optimization systems face sharper demand for documentation and product controls from European customers.
  • The guidance makes governance requirements more tangible for buyers and suppliers, extending the compliance work beyond the high-risk systems anticipated in the AI Act’s initial framework.

Third-order effects

  • If this guidance becomes the practical benchmark for oversight, AI competition in Europe will increasingly turn on whether providers can demonstrate that product design avoids prohibited uses, not only on model capability.
  • The move points toward a broader AI compliance stack in which rules are progressively specified through guidance, as later EU work on systemic-risk model compliance guidance suggests.

The trend: The EU is moving from principle-led AI governance toward use-specific implementation guidance that embeds compliance constraints into product and procurement decisions.

Discussion

  • @bertuzluca Luca Bertuzzi on x
    A significant caveat in the accompanying communication: “The Guidelines will be formally adopted by the Commission at a later date, when all language versions are available. It is only from that moment that these Guidelines will be applicable.”
  • @bertuzluca Luca Bertuzzi on x
    Interesting wording that could capture targeted ads: “Another example is personalized manipulation where an AI system that creates and tailors highly persuasive messages based on an individual's personal data... to a point of creating significant harm.”
  • @luizajarovsky Luiza Jarovsky on x
    🚨 BREAKING: Today, the EU Commission published the Guidelines on the EU AI Act's prohibited AI practices. If you are in AI, this is the document you should BOOKMARK & DOWNLOAD today. But before, read this👇 ➡️ Important limitations, exclusions, and examples: - “These [image]
  • @vtchakarova Velina Tchakarova on x
    The EU developed AI Act instead of AI. To paraphrase Geoffrey Howe, the EU is like a man who knows 364 ways of making love, but doesn't know any women. [image]
  • @bertuzluca Luca Bertuzzi on x
    ‼️The Commission's guidelines on the #AIAct's prohibited practices are finally out. A whopping 140 pages long. A lot of information to digest. The guidelines on the AI system definition are not ready yet, but will be out ‘soon’. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/ ...