/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Siri with Apple Intelligence is a massive regression from the old Siri, which recognized its limitations and provided a list of search links to answer a query

Writing about the current state of Apple Intelligence yesterday, I mentioned how utterly stupid and laughably wrong Siri is when asked …

Daring Fireball John Gruber

Context & Ripple Effects

Apple positioned Siri updates as part of the initial Apple Intelligence developer betas, but coverage of the rollout already noted that some promised capabilities were absent. This critique focuses on a more basic failure mode: replacing an explicit search-results fallback with answers that can be wrong.

It also fits a long-running record of Siri’s constraints, including reporting that organizational dysfunction and limited ambition hindered Apple’s AI work. Later reports that personalized Siri may need a rebuild reinforce that this is not merely a surface-level interface complaint.

First-order effects

  • People using Siri for open-ended queries lose a transparent fallback to search links when the assistant cannot answer reliably; incorrect answers become the visible outcome instead.
  • Apple’s Apple Intelligence rollout faces a credibility problem in one of its most prominent consumer interfaces, especially where Siri previously signaled uncertainty rather than presenting a bad answer.

Second-order effects

  • Search providers and publishers may receive fewer direct referral opportunities from Siri queries if answer generation displaces link lists, even when the generated response is not dependable.
  • Apple is pressured to improve answer quality or restore clearer escalation paths to web results; a reported need to rebuild personalized Siri would make that trade-off more consequential.

Third-order effects

  • The episode highlights a durable product-design tension in AI assistants: replacing search navigation with generated answers raises the cost of errors unless the product preserves clear provenance and fallback options.
  • If assistants increasingly become the interface for discovery, platform owners’ distribution advantage will depend not just on model capability but on whether users trust them to acknowledge uncertainty.

The trend: Consumer AI assistants are shifting from link-based retrieval to direct answers, making reliability, transparency, and fallback design central competitive features.

Discussion

  • @shiraovide Shira Ovide on bluesky
    Genuinely HOW is Siri this bad? onefoottsunami.com/2025/01/23/ n...  “With the absolute most charitable interpretation, Siri correctly provided the winner of just 20 of the 58 Super Bowls that have been played.”
  • @gruber John Gruber on threads
    I had so much fun writing this one. https://daringfireball.net/...
  • @neilcybart Neil Cybart on x
    @jammasternate I don't know. I'm getting a pretty different experience on my end. I think Siri has made some interesting strides lately. Allowing the user to speak more natural is a big one that normal users will benefit from. I actually find the improvements to be legitimately g…
  • @jammasternate @jammasternate on x
    An extremely valid argument that Siri in 2025 still sucks and is possibly even worse than before. Apple is indeed far behind on having any useful AI tools aside from the emoji stuff and some text editing.
  • @ditheringfm @ditheringfm on x
    Siri's AI Ineptitude Siri with AI is somehow much worse at answering questions. Subscribe at https://dithering.fm/ [video]
  • @neilcybart Neil Cybart on x
    @jammasternate I just asked how many championships UConn men's bball had. Siri got it wrong. ChatGPT got it wrong too. Meanwhile, Siri via ChatGPT got it right. We are still in early days for that kind of trivia retrieval. I do wonder if one's opinion on Siri partnerships and suc…