/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Meta's fact-checking partners PolitiFact and FactCheck.org say they had no role in deciding what the company did with fact-checked content, denying Meta's claim

Fact-checking groups that worked with Meta said they had no role in deciding what the company did with the content that was fact-checked.

New York Times Stuart A. Thompson

Discussion

  • @eff.org @eff.org on bluesky
    We applaud Meta's efforts to try to fix its over-censorship problem but will watch closely to make sure it is a good-faith effort and rolled out fairly and not merely a political maneuver to accommodate the upcoming U.S. administration change.
  • @katestarbird Kate Starbird on bluesky
    Fact-checking wasn't “biased” against conservatives.  Conservatives just shared more false content.  If there's a sportsball game and one team fouls four times as much, it's not “biased” for the ref to call four times as many fouls against that team.  [embedded post]
  • @donie Donie O'Sullivan on x
    Meta fact-checkers respond to being unceremoniously fired by Mark Zuckerberg. Fact-checker @AlanDukeNews says in his years working with the company, Meta never complained about the supposed-bias Zuckerberg cited as a reason for firing them. [video]
  • @realchrisrufo Christopher F. Rufo on x
    They really wrote this and then published it. [image]
  • r/politics r on reddit
    Meta says factcheckers were the problem.  Factcheckers ruled that false.
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Mark Zuckerberg Says Meta Fact-Checkers Were the Problem.  Fact-Checkers Rule That False.
  • r/inthenews r on reddit
    Mark Zuckerberg Says Meta Fact-Checkers Were the Problem.  Fact-Checkers Rule That False.
  • r/economy r on reddit
    Mark Zuckerberg Says Meta Fact-Checkers Were the Problem.  Fact-Checkers Rule That False.
  • @pranavdixit @pranavdixit on x
    🚨 Scoop: Meta's US fact-checking partnerships will officially end in March, and payments to partners will continue through August. https://www.businessinsider.com/ ... Plus: 👉The rollout of Community Notes is expected to take time. Meta will build and implement the system through…
  • @davidgilbert David Gilbert on bluesky
    An emergency meeting organized by the International Fact Checking Network is due to kick off shortly, after fact checking organizations were left “blindsided” by Meta's decision to end its partnership with them  —  www.wired.com/story/metas-...
  • @katestarbird Kate Starbird on bluesky
    This is extra-funny, since the fact-checkers often bent over backwards to not appear to be biased against conservatives.  And also, because the “bias” isn't with the fact-checking, but with conservatives sharing more false/misleading content. bsky.app/profile/kate...  [embedded p…
  • @dell Dell Cameron on bluesky
    Just thinking about the time I emailed Facebook's spox, Andy Stone, a copy of our newsroom's policy for communication professionals, and he immediately text another WIRED staffer asking them to violate it b/c he said they had a “good relationship.”  [embedded post]
  • @bevymart @bevymart on bluesky
    There's political bias in fact checking only because most of the bullshit is coming from one party.
  • @couts Andrew Couts on bluesky
    NEW: The fact-check organizations that partnered with Meta are now scrambling to figure out if they can survive this morning's rug-pull. @davidgilbert.bsky.social reports: www.wired.com/story/metas-...
  • @matthewfacciani Matthew Facciani on threads
    “Facts are not censorship.  Fact-checkers never censored anything.  And Meta always held the cards.  It's time to quit invoking inflammatory and false language in describing the role of journalists and fact-checking.” https://www.wired.com/...
  • @pranavdixit @pranavdixit on x
    🚨Scoop: The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) has convened an emergency meeting of its members tomorrow following Meta's announcement that it will end its third-party fact-checking partnerships in the US. https://www.businessinsider.com/ ...
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Meta's Fact-Checking Partners Say They Were ‘Blindsided’ by Decision to Axe Them
  • r/technews r on reddit
    Meta's Fact-Checking Partners Say They Were ‘Blindsided’ by Decision to Axe Them