/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Video game executives say making cinematic games is getting so expensive and time-consuming that investing in graphics is providing diminished financial returns

The gaming industry spent billions pursuing the idea that customers wanted realistic graphics.  Did executives misread the market? Bluesky: @baldsavant , @anolen , @thestrangerous , and @thegamechief . Mastodon: @zeh@mastodon.gamedev.place . Threads: @carnage4life . X: @megaapple18 Forums: r/Games , r/technology , and Slashdot Bluesky: Nathan Savant / @baldsavant : Have they considered just, I dunno, not making games into movies?  —  Maybe make games that are just really good at being games.  —  Maybe you don't need to wear someone else's clothes to fit in.  Maybe you can find your own style.  [embedded post] Andrew Nolen / @anolen : How many gamers can tell if ray tracing is being used?  I think the “diminishing returns” are based on our diminishing ability to perceive increased graphical performance.  [embedded post] Jason Murphy / @thestrangerous : This makes a pretty obivous argument for indie games. Brian Reynolds / @thegamechief : It's a hell of a lot *cheaper* to make a game “more fun” than to give it hyperrealistic graphics and hours of voice-acted cinematics, that's the good news.  —  www.nytimes.com/2024/12/26/a... Mastodon: Zeh Fernando / @zeh@mastodon.gamedev.place : Nice, if short, article on the doomed industry of AAA games https://www.nytimes.com/...  I frankly think AAA makes no sense anymore.  Maybe I just have less time, but I am in fact annoyed with games that get stuffed to the brim with checkbox requirements. … Threads: Dare Obasanjo / @carnage4life : Making a AAA game costs between $50 - $300 million given increasing expectations from users about the content, depth of gameplay and storytelling.  However the AAA gaming industry has shrunk post-COVID and has to compete with streaming, TikTok, and perennial games (e.g. Roblox, Fortnite) for people's time. … X: Hemang Chauhan / @megaapple18 : @ZacharyHSmall Would add perspective that lotta folks are missing = word-of-mouth. Magazine/TV era dominated 90s-00s home consoles and that's how teens and YA/adults formed their tastes (along with retail stores). Internet boom and E3 videos/trailers/fan content formed the basis in early 10s.. Forums: r/Games : Video Games Can't Afford to Look This Good r/technology : Video Games Can't Afford to Look This Good.  The industry, which was hit with layoffs and studio closures this year, is now wondering whether … Msmash / Slashdot : Video Games Can't Afford To Look This Good

New York Times Zachary Small

Context & Ripple Effects

This is the latest expression of a long-running AAA production squeeze: static premium-game pricing, slower release schedules and developer burnout were already pressuring the high-budget model. Executives now frame graphics spending itself—not just the cadence of releases—as a weaker source of return.

The argument also sits beside a pixel-art and stylized-game renaissance and the funding and closure pressures facing independent studios. Together, that coverage makes the key issue less about technical capability than whether visual realism is the best use of development budgets.

First-order effects

  • AAA publishers face a sharper trade-off between expensive visual fidelity and investments in gameplay, design, and release scope; the latter are presented as cheaper ways to improve a game’s appeal.
  • Studios built around long, cinematic productions face greater budget and schedule risk when incremental graphical gains are hard for players to perceive.

Second-order effects

  • More room opens for stylized and independent games whose economics do not require cinematic-scale assets, though indie studios still face acute funding and closure pressures.
  • AAA teams are pushed to differentiate against perennial games and attention platforms through gameplay and distinctiveness rather than relying primarily on realism.

Third-order effects

  • If publishers consistently redirect budgets away from photorealism, AAA development could become less centered on ever-larger asset pipelines and more segmented between premium spectacles and lower-cost, style-led releases.
  • The durable shift would be from graphics as a default competitive escalator to graphics as one production choice whose value must be justified against cost, time, and player attention.

The trend: Game development is moving toward stricter return-on-investment tests for blockbuster visual production as attention competition and production costs weaken the old realism-first formula.

Discussion

  • @baldsavant Nathan Savant on bluesky
    Have they considered just, I dunno, not making games into movies?  —  Maybe make games that are just really good at being games.  —  Maybe you don't need to wear someone else's clothes to fit in.  Maybe you can find your own style.  [embedded post]
  • @anolen Andrew Nolen on bluesky
    How many gamers can tell if ray tracing is being used?  I think the “diminishing returns” are based on our diminishing ability to perceive increased graphical performance.  [embedded post]
  • @thestrangerous Jason Murphy on bluesky
    This makes a pretty obivous argument for indie games.
  • @thegamechief Brian Reynolds on bluesky
    It's a hell of a lot *cheaper* to make a game “more fun” than to give it hyperrealistic graphics and hours of voice-acted cinematics, that's the good news.  —  www.nytimes.com/2024/12/26/a...
  • @zeh@mastodon.gamedev.place Zeh Fernando on mastodon
    Nice, if short, article on the doomed industry of AAA games https://www.nytimes.com/...  I frankly think AAA makes no sense anymore.  Maybe I just have less time, but I am in fact annoyed with games that get stuffed to the brim with checkbox requirements. …
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on threads
    Making a AAA game costs between $50 - $300 million given increasing expectations from users about the content, depth of gameplay and storytelling.  However the AAA gaming industry has shrunk post-COVID and has to compete with streaming, TikTok, and perennial games (e.g. Roblox, F…
  • @megaapple18 Hemang Chauhan on x
    @ZacharyHSmall Would add perspective that lotta folks are missing = word-of-mouth. Magazine/TV era dominated 90s-00s home consoles and that's how teens and YA/adults formed their tastes (along with retail stores). Internet boom and E3 videos/trailers/fan content formed the basis …
  • r/Games r on reddit
    Video Games Can't Afford to Look This Good
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Video Games Can't Afford to Look This Good.  The industry, which was hit with layoffs and studio closures this year, is now wondering whether …