/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Bluesky is working to become fully decentralized but it could take years amid financial concerns as it makes money only by selling domains for usernames

November has sucked so far.  One upside of the terrible nonsense is that more people are fleeing X. Many are choosing Bluesky.

anderegg.ca Gavin Anderegg

Context & Ripple Effects

Bluesky’s paid custom-domain offering was established in its early domain partnership and first paid service, while AT Protocol’s account-portability work positioned user exit as a design goal rather than a promise of permanent platform control.

The current push arrives as Bluesky draws users leaving X, but commentary in the coverage has questioned whether ATProto is yet decentralized or federated in practice, despite its “credible exit” framing. The gap between that architecture and a self-sustaining business model is therefore central.

First-order effects

  • Bluesky must finance a potentially long transition toward fuller decentralization while relying chiefly on username-domain sales, putting its operating model under immediate pressure.
  • New users arriving from X are joining a service whose independence goals are still being built out, rather than a fully decentralized network they can use today.

Second-order effects

  • A domain-centered revenue and identity strategy also raises trust and support costs: later coverage found domain verification enabled cybersquatting and impersonation, limiting how much verification value the product can safely extract from domains alone.
  • The longer the transition takes, the more Bluesky’s differentiation depends on demonstrating practical portability and governance benefits before user growth turns into expectations it cannot yet meet.

Third-order effects

  • If decentralized social services remain operationally centralized while they scale, “credible exit” is likely to become a competitive governance standard that must be demonstrated through usable portability, not just protocol design.
  • The case highlights a broader tension in open-network products: the features that reduce platform lock-in can also make it harder to capture reliable platform revenue, potentially shaping which decentralized models endure.

The trend: Bluesky is one instance of social platforms trying to pair open, portable network architecture with a business model that can fund the path to genuine decentralization.

Discussion

  • @crumbler Casey Newton on threads
    I was skeptical but must admit it's true: the engagement and follower growth on Bluesky is insane right now.
  • @tomw@mastodon.social Tom Walker on mastodon
    This is an interesting dive into some of the more technical aspects of how decentralised Bluesky is (isn't), which goes out of its way to be fair and assumes more good faith than I would to be honest.  —  The main part I didn't know already is that hosting a “relay” means you mus…
  • @ricmac@mastodon.social Richard MacManus on mastodon
    Really informative post by @gavinanderegg about #Bluesky tech: “Bluesky is slightly more decentralized than, say, Facebook — but not by much.  Yes, you can host your own data.  Yes, you can scrape all of the content on the network.  But you can't do anything with it unless you're…
  • @sewerliberal.bsky.social @sewerliberal.bsky.social on bluesky
    'I've seen Bluesky described as having “theater kid energy” ' 💀 #dgg [embedded post]
  • @stark.soy @stark.soy on bluesky
    One of the good reads I had today was...  [embedded post]
  • @danny.page Danny Page on bluesky
    Interesting that you can do hyperlinks with a title.  I think it's only custom client posting that allows it right now? docs.bsky.app/docs/advance...  [embedded post]
  • @conraddoucette.bsky.social Conrad Doucette on bluesky
    Really interesting and enlightening observations on Bluesky, Threads, Mastadon etc.  Gets a bit deep on the tech details (which I like) but also has some insightful, more top line observations on the current text based social media platform landscape.  —  anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m…
  • @levikornelsen.itch.io Levi Kornelsen on bluesky
    General reminder that while BlueSky may well BECOME federated / decentralized, and it's been developed toward those, it's... Not really either of those at the moment.  —  Which is not “Oh, it's bad”, just: That work isn't done.  —  anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m...
  • @stephenmcgann.uk Stephen McGann on bluesky
    Nice blog post about some of what's going on under the bonnet of Bluesky.  (HT @katebevan.com)  —  anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m...
  • @ianfogg.bsky.social Ian Fogg on bluesky
    Good article on how Bluesky currently works, and the scale of the dev & business model work ahead to deliver its vision - anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m...
  • @davidgerard.co.uk @davidgerard.co.uk on bluesky
    “When writing about Bluesky, I've seen folks mention that it's either federated or decentralized.  I'm here to tell you that it's currently neither.  This one really irks me because the service is getting the credit for work it hasn't done.”  —  anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m...
  • @gavin.anderegg.ca Gavin Anderegg on bluesky
    I wanted to try and collect my thoughts about Bluesky in one place.  I think Bluesky is fascinating, but I also worry about many parts of it.  If it becomes the new “Twitter”, I think I'm OK with that, but I'll be very quick to cut the cord if it ever starts sucking.  —  anderegg…
  • @kachumbali.bsky.social Jonas Koll on bluesky
    If you want to understand how our new village here on #Bluesky works - this is the best explanation I've stumbled across.  —  Also asks a few very good questions - how open is Bluesky?  How much of the data can you control as a user?  —  Thanks @jonworth.eu for finding this  —  a…
  • @davidbisset.com David Bisset on bluesky
    Reading: Maybe #Bluesky has “won”  —  anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m...  Lots to be doubtful about but things picking up stream.  But in the end the smartest tip: “My goal going forward is to post more to my own site and aggregate to any social channel I currently care about.”  #OwnYou…
  • @stoddart.bsky.social Daniel Stoddart on bluesky
    “Bluesky is currently only making money by reselling domains for usernames.  That's not exactly a high-margin business.” anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m...
  • @jonworth.eu Jon Worth on bluesky
    Why Bluesky isn't really decentralised or federated  —  This is the best explainer I've read anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/m...  Does this matter?  —  If Bluesky Social PBC enshittifies there's not much users can do currently other than quit
  • r/AnythingGoesNews r on reddit
    X users jump to Bluesky - but what is it and who owns it?