/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Mark Zuckerberg says Threads is testing custom feeds for certain profiles or topics; the Threads' version seems easier to use than Bluesky's custom feeds

Threads is testing a way to create custom feeds for certain profiles or topics, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on Friday.

The Verge Emma Roth

Context & Ripple Effects

Threads had been adding discovery and control features, including a US Trending now page, after earlier product updates such as sharing posts to Instagram DMs and custom media alt text. Custom feeds extend that work from platform-selected discovery toward user-selected streams.

The test also puts Threads in more direct product comparison with Bluesky: the reported advantage is not the existence of custom feeds, but a potentially simpler way to make them. Later coverage indicates the feature path progressed to letting people make a custom feed their default.

First-order effects

  • Selected Threads users can create feeds around chosen profiles or topics, giving them an alternative to the app’s standard feed for following specific conversations.
  • Threads gains a more configurable discovery tool, while Bluesky faces a direct usability comparison around a feature it already offers.

Second-order effects

  • If the test broadens, creators and communities can direct audiences to topical or account-based streams rather than relying solely on the main feed’s distribution.
  • Making feed creation and selection simpler raises the value of later controls such as setting a custom feed as the default, increasing pressure on social platforms to compete on user control as well as recommendation quality.

Third-order effects

  • The move points to social feeds becoming layered products: algorithmic defaults remain central, but user-built views can reduce the all-or-nothing choice between accepting a ranking system and leaving a platform.
  • Whether custom feeds materially shift engagement depends on adoption and default placement; the durable competitive question is which network can make user control convenient without fragmenting audience discovery.

The trend: Large social networks are adding configurable feed layers to retain the reach of algorithmic discovery while offering users more control over what they see.

Discussion

  • @zuck Mark Zuckerberg on threads
    Starting to test a new way to create dedicated feeds for your favorite topics and profiles.  Enjoy!
  • @willoremus Will Oremus on threads
    threads now copying bluesky features... based on their playbook, this won't be the last
  • @crumbler Casey Newton on threads
    This is cool  —  RE: https://www.threads.net/...
  • @herb.scribner Herb Scribner on threads
    This was needed for a long time.  Looks like the Bluesky momentum has encouraged Meta to move on this.
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on threads
    The @threads team stays cooking.  🧑‍🍳
  • @thetwolauras @thetwolauras on threads
    Bluesky influence?
  • @techjournalism Rich Miller on threads
    Threads could have done this ages ago, and users would have been thrilled.  But they wait until folks go to Bluesky and go “HOLY COW, LISTS AND STARTER PACKS WOOOHOOO!!”  Then it's suddenly a good idea.
  • @realsfdynasty Alex Belenky on threads
    Better get on it, Zuck.  Bluesky is already ahead of the game in terms of features.  Threads need significantly stronger features to have long-term staying power.  Customized feeds are a good idea.  Let's also get chronological feeds going.
  • @drtheresamacphail Theresa MacPhail on threads
    What am I missing?  Bluesky was started by the same person who brought us Twitter.  It's a corp that has been pretty shady in their answers about how they're going to monetize.  I get that they cut all ties with X and Jack, but it's still for-profit...Why am I seeing all these po…
  • @lc-in-ca.bsky.social @lc-in-ca.bsky.social on bluesky
    Nice try, Threads, but I'm pretty sure “ease of use” isn't what is now driving millions of us to Bluesky.
  • @edavis.dev Eric on bluesky
    they scared [embedded post]
  • @neighbor.bsky.social Peter Lewis on bluesky
    @bsky.app would really benefit implementing feed creation that works more like this [embedded post]
  • @blemley.us Brian on bluesky
    Zuckerberg realizing people want their own feeds is nice but will he keep his algorithms out of it?  I can't imagine.  [embedded post]
  • @proggrrl.bsky.social @proggrrl.bsky.social on bluesky
    In other words, he's going to steal several excellent blue sky features to compete.  Definitely tracks.