/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Anthropic evaluates four “sabotage” threat vectors for its Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3.5 Sonnet models and finds that “minimal mitigations are sufficient”

Any industry where there are potential harms needs evaluations.  Nuclear power stations have continuous radiation monitoring …

Anthropic

Discussion

  • @anthropicai @anthropicai on x
    We expect to improve these evaluations over time. We're releasing these details now so that others can build on and critique our approach. More details can be found in the blog post and paper: https://anthropic.com/...
  • @anthropicai @anthropicai on x
    New Anthropic research: Sabotage evaluations for frontier models How well could AI models mislead us, or secretly sabotage tasks, if they were trying to? Read our paper and blog post here: https://anthropic.com/... [image]
  • r/singularity r on reddit
    New Anthropic research: Sabotage evaluations for frontier models.  How well could AI models mislead us, or secretly sabotage tasks, if they were trying to?