Discussion

• @crumbler Casey Newton on threads

  I wrote about Anthropic's new and improved plan to stop AI from doing harm and wondered what might happen if other companies took a similarly proactive approach to identifying risks https://www.platformer.news/ ...

• @cfgeek Charles Foster on x

  Fun fact, while Anthropic's “AI Safety Levels (ASLs)” are inspired by the 4 biosafety levels, there is no limit or inherent meaning to ASLs. Unlike BSL-4, “ASL-4” isn't necessarily the top level or even particularly strict safety/security, it just means “the level above ASL-3”.

• @david_kasten Dave Kasten on x

  I'm still reading this, and more broadly am still somewhat uncertain whether I think RSPs are actually conceptually feasible at higher levels of intelligence, but I do like that they are explicitly logging even minor deviations like “our eval took 3 days longer than the policy”

• @kimmonismus @kimmonismus on x

  Instead of Opus 3.5 we get a safety post. Have they learned from OpenAI? Come on guys, you know what we want.

• @michael05156007 Michael Cohen on x

  Looks like ASL-4 measures are still a to-do. My hypothesis is they can't come up with any satisfactory measures without fundamentally reworking their approach. Every year that they fail to even write down a scheme for handling ASL-4 responsibly, this hypothesis looms larger.

• @adonis_singh Adi on x

  most people shit on anthropic, but this makes me even more excited for opus 3.5 it means it's going to be a smart model, so smart in fact, they had to do this..

• @jasondclinton Jason D. Clinton on x

  I'm excited to share something that we've been working on for the past few months. Big updates to the RSP and more clarity on the security controls in: https://www.anthropic.com/... . We think of the RSP as a prototype for regulation and it holds ourselves accountable to the publ…

• r/ClaudeAI r on reddit

  Anthropic Announces updated Responsible Scaling Policy