/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

BlackBerry to end in-house development of phones, will outsource design, manufacturing, and selling of devices, focus on software after taking $372M loss in Q2

Roger Cheng / CNET :

CNET Roger Cheng

Context & Ripple Effects

This is the endgame of a retreat that has been running for over a year: BlackBerry cut undisclosed numbers of device-business employees in May 2015, then killed the BB10-powered Classic in July 2016. Today's announcement converts that shrinkage into a structural decision — no more in-house phones at all, with design, manufacturing, and sales handed to partners while the company chases software and security revenue.

The $372M Q2 loss is the forcing function: the hardware business is burning cash faster than the turnaround can absorb. The related coverage also previews where the licensing path leads — by 2020, partner-built BlackBerry phones end entirely when TCL's manufacturing license expires, a reminder that outsourced hardware keeps the brand alive only as long as the licensee wants it.

First-order effects

  • BlackBerry's remaining device staff and operations face wind-down or transfer to partners, while the $372M hardware-driven loss moves off BlackBerry's own books as third parties assume design, manufacturing, and selling costs.
  • Partners taking over the devices gain control of the roadmap, meaning future BlackBerry-branded phones reflect licensee economics rather than Waterloo's product judgment.

Second-order effects

  • BlackBerry's pitch to investors shifts to software and security margins, putting it in direct competition with enterprise mobility and security vendors rather than Apple, Samsung, and the Android pack.
  • The brand becomes a licensing asset whose value depends on partner appetite — a dependency that materializes when TCL stops making BlackBerry phones in 2020.

Third-order effects

  • Subscale handset makers without volume economics exit manufacturing for software and licensing — a consolidation pattern in which the phone industry narrows to players with genuine scale and everyone else monetizes intellectual property instead.
  • Licensed hardware brands prove fragile: when the sole licensee walks away, as TCL did, the consumer presence disappears outright, leaving the licensor's enterprise software franchise as the durable business.

The trend: Smartphone manufacturing is consolidating around companies with volume scale, pushing subscale brands like BlackBerry out of hardware and into software and brand licensing.