/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Bank of America, Santander, and the Royal Bank of Canada partner to create a global blockchain payments network using Ripple's distributed ledger technology

Bank of America, Santander and the Royal Bank of Canada have today announced they've joined forces to create a global blockchain …

CoinDesk Michael del Castillo

Context & Ripple Effects

This tri-bank deal is the moment the bank blockchain effort moves from shared research to a named vendor. Nine months after Goldman Sachs, Barclays and others joined the R3 consortium to build a blockchain framework for markets, Bank of America, Santander and RBC are skipping the committee stage and building a global payments network directly on Ripple's distributed ledger.

The choice of Ripple over an industry-owned framework matters: it makes one startup's technology the substrate for interbank settlement, and it sets up the follow-on moves in the coverage — JPMorgan launching its own processing network with ANZ and RBC, Santander extending Ripple to US-UK transfers with American Express, and eventually Santander shipping live cross-border payments in four countries.

First-order effects

  • Bank of America, Santander and RBC get a common settlement rail for cross-border payments, with Ripple as the technology supplier rather than a neutral industry utility.
  • Ripple converts three tier-one bank logos into reference customers, giving it a concrete answer to the R3 consortium's industry-framework pitch.

Second-order effects

  • JPMorgan answers by building its own blockchain payment network with ANZ and RBC — note RBC sits on both sides — pushing banks toward competing rails instead of one shared standard.
  • Santander doubles down on the same vendor, pulling American Express into a Ripple-based US-UK corridor, which pressures other correspondent-banking pairs to pick a ledger.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, cross-border payments consolidate into a handful of competing bank alliances organized around specific ledgers — foreshadowing the 75-plus-bank JPMorgan/RBC/ANZ bloc — with membership in the right consortium, not correspondent relationships, determining settlement reach.
  • Vendor-led infrastructure shifts bargaining power in interbank payments from the banks collectively to whichever technology provider wins the reference-customer race, a dependency regulators would eventually have to weigh.

The trend: Cross-border banking is reorganizing from correspondent networks into competing blockchain consortia built on commercial ledgers like Ripple's, with each alliance racing to sign the next tier of banks.