/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
API keys, docs, usage dashboard
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Social media companies' reliance on Section 230 protections is in jeopardy after a US court ruled TikTok's algorithmic curation is not protected by Section 230

Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act just got torched by the 3rd circuit.  —  https://www.thebignewsletter.com/ ... Lukasz Olejnik / @LukaszOlejnik@mastodon.social : US court ruled that when a company is choosing what to show to people (e.g. seeks to keep them addicted to sell more ads), they can't pretend it's everyone else's fault when horrible thing happens.  Is this the end of liability waiver of Section 230? … X: Jason Kint / @jason_kint : Super interesting delineation being made here between the hosting of content vs providing the velocity and reach to it through targeted recommendations. /2 [image] Jason Kint / @jason_kint : Twitter's legal department must be absolutely freaking out right now. Especially with how the app auto refreshes to the “For You” tab every time a user returns to it. /1 [image] Roger McNamee / @moonalice : In a case involving TikTok, 3rd Circuit concluded that Section 230 provides much, much less protection than internet platforms have come to expect. If sustained, this decision may upend the business models of TikTok, FB, IG, and YT. Great short thread by @jason_kint Lee Hepner / @leehepner : Read this. It's ground-shaking. Matt is the only person reporting that the Third Circuit just dealt a massive blow to Section 230, the law that gives social media platforms and ISPs impunity to distribute harmful curated feeds and targeted ads. Matt Stoller / @matthewstoller : This one's a bit of a shocking Holy S#@&! moment. On Tuesday, the Third Circuit just ended Section 230 as we know it. It'll take a bit of time, but the business model of big tech is over. https://www.thebignewsletter.com/ ... Matt Stoller / @matthewstoller : It's hard to fathom that big tech's business models rely on not having to face wrongful death lawsuits when they encourage children to hang themselves, but there we go. And that era is over. https://www.thebignewsletter.com/ ... Sundeep Peechu / @speechu : This ruling on Section 230 is huge. If it holds, TikTok/FB will be held accountable for harm from algorithmic feeds. Second order effect: content moderation cost goes up massively, AI steps in. LinkedIn: H. B. Acharya, Ph.D. : If this ruling holds up, *the world* is changing.  Hard.  —  To stay competitive in the war for attention, social networks give users exactly what they want … Forums: r/FreeSpeech : Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over

BIG