/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

VC performance report: Andreessen Horowitz lags Sequoia, Benchmark, and Founders Fund, with ROIs of 2.6x, 2.3x, and 1.7x for its three funds

Rare look at startup investors' performance shows Andreessen Horowitz lags Sequoia, Benchmark, Founders Fund  —  Andreessen Horowitz's …

Wall Street Journal Rolfe Winkler

Context & Ripple Effects

The Journal's data lands mid-argument: within days, Both Sides of the Table published an LP case for backing Andreessen Horowitz anyway, arguing that three-fund ROI snapshots miss what a full-service platform firm is building toward. The report gave that debate its first hard numbers — 2.6x, 2.3x, and 1.7x against Sequoia, Benchmark, and Founders Fund.

What came after validates why the comparison was contested rather than settled: a16z kept scaling, growing its investment team to 70 in four years — up 170% — while Benchmark held its traditional small-fund line, a split the Times later framed as two opposing VC models. By 2025, leaked internal decks claimed $25B in net returns since 2009, including $11.2B in 2021 — the counter-narrative to exactly this kind of third-party scorecard.

First-order effects

  • Limited partners deciding on re-ups now have comparable cross-firm ROI data for the first time, forcing a16z to defend its model on platform value rather than fund-level multiples.

Second-order effects

  • Benchmark's small-scale approach becomes the explicit alternative benchmark for LPs, sharpening the industry split between craft funds and a16z's expansion strategy — which it answered with rapid headcount growth.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, venture performance becomes a narrative contest as much as a measured one: firms with scale ambitions invest in their own return storytelling (the later leaked decks) because third-party scorecards will always flatter smaller, concentrated funds.

The trend: Venture capital is splitting into two durable models — concentrated small funds that win on multiples and platform-scale firms that win on brand and network — with each side increasingly curating its own performance evidence.