/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

How a Lending Club user mined the company's data to uncover shady loans made to Lending Club insiders and repeat borrowers

very disappointing scandal http://www.bloomberg.com/... Can numbers from fintech upstarts be trusted? Max Chafkin / @chafkin : If you liked our story about a mayo company buying its own mayo, you'll love sequelhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/ features/2016-08-18/how-lending-club-s- biggest-fanboy-uncovered-shady- loans ... Colin Weir / @radiocolin : “Silicon Valley tends to venerate mildly deceptive tactics when they're used in service of a scrappy upstart” http://www.bloomberg.com/... Mike Dudas / @mdudas : The “no big deal” response by the Foundation Capital VC to clear fraud at Lending Club is a stunner. http://www.bloomberg.com/... Anil Dash / @anildash : Looks like @LendingClub has been buying its own mayo, so to speak. http://www.bloomberg.com/...

Bloomberg

Context & Ripple Effects

This story is the forensic sequel to Bloomberg/WSJ coverage of LendingClub's collapse: the final days of CEO Renaud Laplanche ended with his ouster over loan irregularities, and this piece shows how an outside user — not an auditor or regulator — mined the company's own published data to surface shady loans to insiders and repeat borrowers. The reaction quotes frame the deeper issue: Max Chafkin ties it to prior coverage of circular self-dealing, Colin Weir argues Silicon Valley excuses 'mildly deceptive tactics' by scrappy upstarts, and Mike Dudas calls out a Foundation Capital VC dismissing clear fraud as 'no big deal'.

Why it matters: if a retail user can find what institutional investors missed, the credibility of fintech-upstart loan data itself becomes the story.

First-order effects

  • Lending Club faces immediate pressure on two fronts: its insider and repeat-borrower loans are now publicly documented from its own data, and its VC backers' 'no big deal' posture becomes a reputational liability rather than shelter.
  • Investors in marketplace-lending paper must re-underwrite platforms whose headline origination numbers are shown to be minable for exactly the anomalies diligence should have caught.

Second-order effects

  • Rival online lenders inherit a trust discount: buyers of their loans will demand the kind of granular, outsider-verifiable disclosure that just embarrassed Lending Club, raising funding costs across the category.
  • The episode hands consumer-protection enforcers a template — the same playbook of documented misrepresentation later used to shut down LendUp under a CFPB order shows where regulator attention lands once the pattern is visible.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds — Lending Club's insider loans, LendUp's ordered shutdown, Eco's misrepresented 'rewards APY', Tala's sky-high Kenyan rates — fintech lending consolidates around players who can survive external audits of their own data, while startup-venerated growth metrics lose their default credibility.
  • Accountability shifts structurally toward outsiders: users, journalists, and eventually regulators doing the forensic work that boards and VCs declined, making 'scrappy upstart' cover progressively less defensible.

The trend: Fintech lending keeps proving that self-reported platform data can't be taken at face value, with outsiders and regulators — not boards or VCs — becoming the sector's real audit function.