/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Infoblox and Eclypsium: since 2018, Russian hackers hijacked 35K+ registered domains using Sitting Ducks attacks that involve exploiting DNS configuration flaws

Threat actors have hijacked more than 35,000 registered domains in so-called Sitting Ducks attacks that allow claiming …

BleepingComputer Bill Toulas

Context & Ripple Effects

This extends a long-running DNS-abuse arc: earlier coverage documented state-backed domain hijacking against critical infrastructure and a broader campaign serious enough to draw a DHS emergency directive over DNS attacks and its defensive implications.

The scale attributed to Sitting Ducks also fits Infoblox's prior tracking of infrastructure services built for cybercriminal use, including an actor associated with large-scale domain registrations and link-shortening services. It matters because DNS configuration weaknesses can turn legitimate registered domains into attacker-controlled assets.

First-order effects

  • Owners of the affected domains face remediation of vulnerable DNS configurations and potential investigation of traffic, email, or services routed through hijacked domains.
  • Infoblox and Eclypsium's findings give defenders a concrete, multi-year pattern to hunt for in domain and DNS-management environments.

Second-order effects

  • DNS providers, registrars, and managed-service operators face pressure to identify configurations that leave domains claimable and to make ownership and delegation controls more visible to customers.
  • Security teams must treat a domain's registration as insufficient evidence of trust, increasing the value of DNS telemetry and configuration validation alongside reputation-based blocking.

Third-order effects

  • If configuration-based takeovers continue at this scale, DNS security will shift further from a registrar-administration task toward a continuously monitored control-plane risk shared by domain owners and providers.
  • The pattern could favor platforms that can pair domain intelligence with configuration monitoring, while raising expectations for clearer provider accountability over misconfigured delegations.

The trend: Sitting Ducks is one instance of a broader trend in which attackers operationalize overlooked internet-control-plane misconfigurations to acquire trusted infrastructure at scale.

Discussion

  • Infoblox Blog Infoblox Blog on x
    Who Knew? Domain Hijacking is So Easy
  • r/cybersecurity r on reddit
    Sitting Ducks DNS attacks let hackers hijack over 35,000 domains