/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

IDC: ~350M people in India still use a feature phone, and 50% of them have a model that costs less than $18; the ASP of a smartphone is $255, up 54% from 2020

Jagmeet Singh / TechCrunch :

TechCrunch Jagmeet Singh

Context & Ripple Effects

India’s handset market has long had a split entry tier: feature-phone shipments doubled while smartphones were flat in early 2018, and $25 smart feature phones brought first-time users online in 2019. IDC’s new figures show that the low-cost end remains substantial even as smartphone pricing has moved higher.

That divide matters because later coverage points to a smartphone market increasingly shaped by higher-priced devices: Apple’s share reached a record level amid flat overall smartphone shipments. The remaining feature-phone base is therefore a material constraint on treating smartphone demand as a single market.

First-order effects

  • The reported $255 smartphone ASP versus a feature-phone base concentrated below $18 makes the affordability gap explicit for hundreds of millions of users.
  • Handset makers and distributors must serve two sharply different demand pools: ultra-low-cost basic phones and a smartphone market with a much higher average price point.

Second-order effects

  • Brands seeking new smartphone users will face pressure to make entry devices and financing more accessible, while feature phones and smart-feature-phone formats retain a role at the lowest price points.
  • A higher smartphone ASP can lift the importance of premium sales for vendors, but it also leaves unit growth more exposed to price increases; later reporting found broad smartphone price hikes weighing on sales.

Third-order effects

  • If the gap persists, India’s handset market is likely to remain structurally segmented rather than following a simple, uniform migration from feature phones to smartphones.
  • The conversion of feature-phone users becomes a question of affordable device access as much as product availability, with lower-cost connected-phone categories potentially acting as an intermediate tier.

The trend: India’s mobile-device market is bifurcating between premiumizing smartphones and a durable ultra-low-cost feature-phone base.