/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at Apate, a conversational bot developed by Macquarie University's Cyber Security Hub in Australia to keep scam callers on the line while collecting data

Tory Shepherd / The Guardian :

The Guardian Tory Shepherd

Context & Ripple Effects

Apate applies conversational AI to an adversarial communications problem: rather than helping a caller complete a task, it is built to prolong scam interactions and capture intelligence from them. That places it on the defensive side of the same chatbot capabilities that related coverage says have been adapted for phishing and malware activity.

The approach later appeared in a consumer-facing form when a UK operator introduced an AI scambaiter posing as an elderly caller. Apate matters as an earlier research-led example of using conversational systems to turn scam calls into a source of operational data.

First-order effects

  • Apate gives Macquarie University's Cyber Security Hub a tool to engage scam callers automatically while collecting data from those interactions.
  • Scam callers who reach Apate can spend time in a nonproductive conversation, while the system generates information that can be examined for patterns.

Second-order effects

  • The collected call data can improve understanding of scam operations, potentially helping defenders prioritize blocking, investigation, or user-warning efforts.
  • The tool adds defensive pressure to an environment where generative chatbots have also been associated with phishing- and malware-oriented tools, making conversational AI a capability used on both sides of fraud prevention.

Third-order effects

  • If deployed and operationally useful at scale, AI scambaiting could shift part of fraud defense from reactive filtering toward automated intelligence gathering during live attacks.
  • Its value will depend on whether collected interactions can be converted into actionable signals without creating new privacy, oversight, or misuse problems; the corpus does not establish that outcome.

The trend: Conversational AI is becoming dual-use infrastructure, with defenders adapting the same interaction skills exploited in scams into tools for disrupting and analyzing fraud.

Discussion

  • r/technology r on reddit
    Real criminals, fake victims: how chatbots are being deployed in the global fight against phone scammers