/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at Apate, a conversational bot developed by Macquarie University's Cyber Security Hub in Australia to keep scam callers on the line while collecting data

New scambaiting AI technology Apate aims to keep scammers on the line while collecting data that could help disrupt their business model

The Guardian Tory Shepherd

Context & Ripple Effects

Apate applies conversational AI defensively: rather than merely blocking suspected fraud, Macquarie University’s Cyber Security Hub uses it to prolong scam calls and capture information that may help investigators disrupt operations. That approach sits against the earlier emergence of generative-AI chatbots tailored to phishing and malware, which lowered the barrier to automating criminal outreach.

The concept also foreshadows Virgin Media O2’s Daisy scambaiter, showing how conversational systems can be deployed as active countermeasures rather than only as filters or warnings.

First-order effects

  • Apate can consume scammers’ time while generating call data for the Cyber Security Hub’s analysis, shifting a scam interaction from a one-sided target encounter into a potential intelligence source.
  • Scam callers that reach the system face a less efficient calling workflow, while legitimate consumers are kept out of that particular engagement.

Second-order effects

  • The model gives telecom operators and anti-fraud teams a template for using conversational agents alongside blocking and detection systems; the later Daisy deployment by a UK mobile operator illustrates that operational direction.
  • As scam outreach is increasingly automated, defensive systems will need to distinguish useful intelligence collection from interactions that create privacy, safety, or escalation risks.

Third-order effects

  • If scambaiting agents become widely deployed, anti-fraud operations could shift toward automated adversary engagement, with call-level intelligence becoming a more important input to disruption efforts.
  • This is part of an AI security arms race: the same conversational capabilities that support criminal phishing and malware tools can be repurposed for defensive deception, making governance and reliable controls more consequential.

The trend: Conversational AI is moving from passive detection toward autonomous, adversarial engagement in fraud defense.