How 21-year-old Opera sold for $1.2B and why CEO Lars Boilesen and CTO Håkon Wium Lie are ambivalent about it
Opera's $1.2B sale: Shocking underdog victory or cruel twist of fate 21 years in the making? — The news that Norway's Opera Software accepted a $1.2 billion buyout offer …
Context & Ripple Effects
This sale was eighteen months in the making. After Opera lowered its growth estimates for the second time in six months in August 2015, the board hired bankers for a strategic review that ended in February with a $1.2B offer from a Chinese consortium at a 53% premium, which the board unanimously recommended.
What makes the VentureBeat interview notable is the aftermath the coverage already documents: the browser business went to the Chinese investors while the listed shell rebranded as Otello Corporation in 2017, and by mid-2018 the Opera browser itself was back on public markets, opening up 19.5% on its first day of trading in the US after a $115M IPO.
First-order effects
- Opera's shareholders capture an immediate 53% premium on a stock that had been repriced downward through 2015, while the browser — the company's identity for 21 years — passes out of Norwegian independent control to the Chinese consortium.
- CEO Lars Boilesen and CTO Håkon Wium Lie are left publicly reconciling the exit they helped negotiate with the loss of independence, an ambivalence the board's unanimous recommendation does not resolve.
Second-order effects
- The split creates two divergent paths: Otello inherits the non-browser assets and the listing, while the Chinese-backed browser operation must fund its own growth — culminating in the 2018 US IPO that raised $115M and another $60M privately from Bitmain and IDG.
- For other sub-scale European browser makers watching Opera, the deal demonstrates that a stalled-growth consumer browser can still command a premium exit from Asian buyers rather than fade into maintenance mode.
Third-order effects
- If the pattern holds, Europe's small independent consumer-software firms become acquisition targets once growth guidance slips twice, with the brand often relisting later under new ownership — a sell-then-relist cycle rather than a one-way exit.
- Founder-level ambivalence like Lie's becomes a recurring feature of these deals: boards optimize for shareholder premium while the engineers who built the product weigh what national and cultural independence was worth.
The trend: Stalled-growth European consumer software is increasingly exiting to Chinese consortia at premiums, then relisting under new ownership — with founder ambivalence marking the cost of the trade.