/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Kaiko: in the past year, Binance's bitcoin trading share outside the US fell from 81.3% to 55.3%, OKX's rose from 3% to 7.3%, and Bybit's rose from 2% to 9.3%

Suvashree Ghosh / Bloomberg :

Bloomberg Suvashree Ghosh

Context & Ripple Effects

Binance’s reduced share extends a pattern visible when its share fell sharply after a CFTC lawsuit and the end of some zero-fee trading. The new figures show that the lost activity is being distributed across major centralized rivals rather than disappearing from the market.

This matters because bitcoin trading liquidity is becoming less dependent on one offshore venue: OKX and Bybit together gained meaningful share while Binance remained the largest platform in Kaiko’s measure.

First-order effects

  • Binance’s share of bitcoin trading outside the US declined from 81.3% to 55.3% over the year, reducing its dominance of this specific liquidity pool.
  • OKX and Bybit gained immediate relevance for traders seeking non-US bitcoin liquidity, reaching 7.3% and 9.3% share, respectively.

Second-order effects

  • Binance faces greater pressure to defend trading activity through its market structure, pricing, and liquidity offerings as rival venues attract more order flow.
  • As volume spreads across exchanges, traders and liquidity providers must place greater weight on execution quality and cross-venue access rather than treating Binance as the default offshore market.

Third-order effects

  • If the redistribution persists, offshore crypto trading could shift from a single-venue structure toward a more competitive, fragmented liquidity market.
  • The episode fits a broader legitimacy and concentration challenge for crypto platforms: market share can move quickly when a dominant exchange’s operating conditions change.

The trend: Bitcoin trading is gradually dispersing from a dominant offshore exchange toward a larger set of centralized venues competing for liquidity.