/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

ASML reports Q1 net sales down 21.6% YoY to €5.29B, vs. €5.39B est., net income down 37.4% YoY to €1.22B, vs. €1.07B est., and net bookings down 4% YoY to €3.6B

A logo on the exterior of the ASML Holding NV headquarters in Veldhoven, Netherlands, on Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2024.

CNBC Arjun Kharpal

Context & Ripple Effects

ASML entered 2024 after forecasting flat revenue growth for the year in its October 2023 outlook, making the Q1 revenue miss and profit decline an early test of that cautious posture.

Related coverage subsequently showed that Q2 sales still declined year over year even as they exceeded expectations, while later order-booking volatility underscored that quarterly demand visibility remained uneven.

First-order effects

  • ASML’s Q1 sales missed estimates, net income fell more sharply than sales, and shares dropped more than 7%, immediately resetting investor expectations for the quarter.
  • Net bookings fell 4% year over year to €3.6B, weakening the near-term demand signal attached to ASML’s order pipeline.

Second-order effects

  • Lower bookings make the timing of ASML’s future revenue conversion less certain, increasing attention on subsequent order intake rather than sales alone.
  • Chipmakers and other equipment vendors gain a clearer signal that capital-equipment spending may be uneven quarter to quarter, rather than tracking a smooth recovery.

Third-order effects

  • If volatile bookings persist, semiconductor-equipment valuations and planning will be driven increasingly by backlog quality and customer spending timing, not only reported revenue.
  • The pattern fits a more cyclical AI and memory investment environment, in which concentrated large equipment orders can amplify quarter-to-quarter swings.

The trend: ASML’s results are one data point in an AI- and memory-led semiconductor capex cycle with uneven equipment-order timing.

Discussion

  • @savvytrader @savvytrader on x
    $ASML 's Q1 earnings visualized [image]
  • @economyapp @economyapp on x
    $ASML ASML Q1 FY24: • Net bookings €3.6B (including EUV €0.7B). • Net sales -22% Y/Y to €5.3B. • Gross margin 51% (flat Y/Y). • Operating margin 26% (-6pp Y/Y). Guidance: • FY24: Revenue similar to FY23 (unchanged). • FY25: Significant growth. [image]