/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Sources: the UK plans talks this month with Apple, Meta, and others to push a voluntary charter granting parents more control of social media use by young teens

Ellen Milligan / Bloomberg : X: @arollingsloane , @jamesrbuk , @alecmuffett , and @webdevlaw X: @arollingsloane : they shouldn't agree too it bcos the ‘disturbing content’ is literally just gonna be the fact that lgbt+ ppl exist. also this nannying bullshit is annoying in general. it's the parents responsibility. James Ball / @jamesrbuk : The huge push on teens and social media feels like outsourcing parenting to social media. Teens will do better on social if not introduced to it suddenly. Most parental controls that exist are barely used, so how will adding more help? Bans likely to backfire even more harshly. Alec Muffett / @alecmuffett : @jamesrbuk Can we call this the #helicopterparentscharter https://twitter.com/... Heather Burns / @webdevlaw : “The proposed voluntary charter may involve tech firms agreeing to alert parents when their children are repeatedly looking up disturbing content” And what if the “disturbing content” the children are looking up concerns the way their parents are raising and treating them?

Bloomberg Ellen Milligan

Discussion

  • @arollingsloane @arollingsloane on x
    they shouldn't agree too it bcos the ‘disturbing content’ is literally just gonna be the fact that lgbt+ ppl exist. also this nannying bullshit is annoying in general. it's the parents responsibility.
  • @jamesrbuk James Ball on x
    The huge push on teens and social media feels like outsourcing parenting to social media. Teens will do better on social if not introduced to it suddenly. Most parental controls that exist are barely used, so how will adding more help? Bans likely to backfire even more harshly.
  • @alecmuffett Alec Muffett on x
    @jamesrbuk Can we call this the #helicopterparentscharter https://twitter.com/...
  • @webdevlaw Heather Burns on x
    “The proposed voluntary charter may involve tech firms agreeing to alert parents when their children are repeatedly looking up disturbing content” And what if the “disturbing content” the children are looking up concerns the way their parents are raising and treating them?