/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Anthropic researchers detail “many-shot jailbreaking”, which can evade LLMs' safety guardrails by priming them with dozens of harmful queries in a single prompt

How do you get an AI to answer a question it's not supposed to?  There are many such “jailbreak” techniques …

TechCrunch Devin Coldewey

Discussion

  • @microh.bsky.social MicRoh on bluesky
    “So if you ask it to build a bomb right away, it will refuse.  But if you ask it to answer 99 other questions of lesser harmfulness and then ask it to build a bomb... it's a lot more likely to comply.”  [embedded post]
  • @anthropicai @anthropicai on x
    Many-shot jailbreaking might be hard to eliminate. Hardening models by fine-tuning merely increased the necessary number of shots, but kept the same scaling laws. We had more success with prompt modification. In one case, this reduced MSJ's effectiveness from 61% to 2%.
  • @pmarca Marc Andreessen on x
    Whitepill!
  • @anthropicai @anthropicai on x
    This is usually ineffective when there are only a small number of dialogues in the prompt. But as the number of dialogues ("shots") increases, so do the chances of a harmful response: [image]
  • @jayelmnop Jesse Mu on x
    Another thorny safety challenge for LLMs. Like Sleeper Agents ( https://twitter.com/...), @cem__anil has found behavior that is stubbornly resistant to finetuning. Training on MSJ shifts the intercept, but not the slope, of the relationship b/t # of shots and attack efficacy. [im…
  • @paul_cal Paul Calcraft on x
    @AnthropicAI My biggest takeaway re: many-shot jailbreak is actually the unreasonable effectiveness of this Cautionary Warning Defense prompt: jailbreak effectiveness tanks from 61% to 2%. I've found final-message appended reminders useful for boosting instruction following gener…
  • @anthropicai @anthropicai on x
    New Anthropic research paper: Many-shot jailbreaking. We study a long-context jailbreaking technique that is effective on most large language models, including those developed by Anthropic and many of our peers. Read our blog post and the paper here: https://www.anthropic.com/...…
  • @anthropicai @anthropicai on x
    We're sharing this to help fix the vulnerability as soon as possible. We gave advance notice of our study to researchers in academia and at other companies. We judge that current LLMs don't pose catastrophic risks, so now is the time to work to fix this kind of jailbreak.
  • r/LocalLLaMA r on reddit
    Many-shot jailbreaking \ Anthropic