A look at the international battles to regulate AI, as nations, lobbyists, and tech companies vie for influence over the future of AI policy

Inside the shadowy global battle to tame the world's most dangerous technology — Can anyone control AI? — By Mark Scott, Gian Volpicelli, Mohar Chatterjee, Vincent Manancourt,

Politico 2024-03-27

@pratyushbuddiga Pratyush on x
Zuck making a fool of the charlatan Tristan Harris is a great example of tech having its mojo again in 2024. We're so back.
@megangra Megan Gray on x
My favorite part of this fantastic story is the correction. CORRECTION: A previous version of this article misstated which firms favor restricting the technology to a small number of firms. They are Microsoft and OpenAI. https://www.politico.eu/...
@louisanslow Louis Anslow on x
Politico profile on AI lobbying has HILARIOUS anecdote: Tristan Harris showed lawmakers META chatbot could give instructions to make bio-weapon Mark Zuckerberg was present, took out phone & got same instructions using Google Room erupted into laughter! https://www.politico.eu/...…
@pmarca Marc Andreessen on x
Of course.
@neil_chilson Neil Chilson on x
@LouisAnslow Zuck did the ol' “Let Me Google That For You.” #LMGTFY [image]
@senatorshoshana @senatorshoshana on x
This is a huge point. This is already available in lots of other places
r/singularity r on reddit
Hilarious anecdote where Zuck put down notorious doomer Tristan Harris, who was arguing to US lawmakers that Meta's approach to open source AI is dangerous. …
r/netsec r on reddit
Inside the shadowy global battle to tame the world's most dangerous technology
r/privacy r on reddit
Inside the shadowy global battle to tame the world's most dangerous technology
r/cybersecurity r on reddit
Inside the shadowy global battle to tame the world's most dangerous technology.

Chronicles