/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

X's audio and video calls, which are on by default, are peer-to-peer, revealing users' IP addresses to each other unless they toggle an enhanced privacy setting

The new X calling feature can hurt your privacy  —  In his quest to turn a simple and functioning Twitter app into X …

TechCrunch

Context & Ripple Effects

X positioned calling as a way to communicate without exchanging phone numbers, then expanded the feature from a limited rollout to broader availability. The earlier rollout to all users made the default network design relevant to a much larger share of the service.

The feature had already given users controls over who may call them, including an opt-out and caller-permission model. This report adds a separate privacy consideration: what technical information is exposed once a call connects.

First-order effects

  • People using X calls must enable the enhanced privacy setting if they do not want their IP address shared directly with the other party.
  • X inherits an immediate trust and usability problem: a safety-relevant control is optional while the peer-to-peer behavior is the default.

Second-order effects

  • The broader calling rollout means privacy-conscious users may reassess whether to enable calls at all, rather than only narrowing who can contact them.
  • The distinction between contact permissions and connection privacy raises the burden on X to make call settings and their consequences clearer to users.

Third-order effects

  • If social platforms continue adding communications features atop public identity networks, privacy defaults—not merely feature availability—will become a central point of product differentiation.
  • The episode illustrates a persistent trade-off in platform expansion: replacing phone-number-based communication can reduce one form of exposure while introducing network-level exposure unless privacy protections are designed into the default.

The trend: Social platforms are evolving into all-in-one communication services, making network-privacy defaults as consequential as their messaging and calling features.

Discussion

  • @chickenpuppet.bsky.social @chickenpuppet.bsky.social on bluesky
    Im the guy that wants to do video calls on Twitter that cares about this [embedded post]
  • @niedermeyer.io E.W. Niedermeyer on bluesky
    bit of a pivot from encrypted dms, but I admire the commitment to radical transparency [embedded post]
  • @jsrailton John Scott-Railton on x
    @citizenlab 6/ So many at-risk activists still use Twitter / X. Their stakes are life, death and liberty as @maasalan rightly points out. By @sanyaburgess https://inews.co.uk/... [image]
  • @lowcotv @lowcotv on x
    Heads up, especially creators, the new X feature to accept calls is turned on and it REVEALS YOUR IP ADDRESS by default! Apparently we are back in the Skype era. Make sure to at least turn on call privacy. [image]
  • @jsrailton John Scott-Railton on x
    5/ Dictators target dissidents & protesters via Twitter. Pushing a default-on feature with privacy and security risks to everyone's phones is reckless. E.g. our @citizenlab report: https://citizenlab.ca/... [image]
  • @jsrailton John Scott-Railton on x
    7/ So @lorenzofb & @zackwhittaker took a quick poke at Twitter calling and found... periscope? ft contributing reporting by @CarlyPage_ & @JagmeetS13 https://techcrunch.com/... [image]
  • @gergelyorosz Gergely Orosz on x
    Instantly opted out - why is this option-in by default?! A security nightmare: “Important context for safety: by default, calls are enabled & every call reveals both users' IP addresses to each other. Users who wish to keep IPs private must change their privacy settings.”
  • @jsrailton John Scott-Railton on x
    4/ A gentle personal plea to @XSecurity: P2p calling & chat apps = *super* heavily targeted for 0click dev b/c of discoverability, ubiquity, complex call stack, etc... Given your high profile+risk users, please prioritize actively monitoring for exploit dev + targeting.
  • @jsrailton John Scott-Railton on x
    2/ Security side: Adding a call stack = big new attack surface. In the context of X's gutted security teams, you have a recipe for trouble. There's a reason device-to-device call apps are heavily targeted by sophisticated attackers. Story @iblametom https://www.forbes.com/... [im…
  • @sanyaburgess Sanya Burgess on x
    PRIVACY ISSUE! I actually can't believe this is real but X has made it so people can call you via your account. Doing so reveals your IP address. To turn this off, go to your DMs, hit the settings cough and then toggle the option off: [image]
  • @jsrailton John Scott-Railton on x
    PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY: turn off Twitter calls. The feature was just enabled for everyone. Cue spam, harassment & privacy risks. Troublingly, the feature exposes your IP address in calls. PICS: instructions on how to turn it off. Via: https://www.tomsguide.com/... [image]
  • r/technology r on reddit
    New X feature can leak your location without you realising