Sources: Meta is reducing payments to news outlets that fact-check potential WhatsApp misinformation, including on elections, and has cut CrowdTangle funding
The Information :
The Information
Context & Ripple Effects
This fits a longer retrenchment from Meta’s prior support for publishers: the company had already considered reducing payments to news outlets while shifting attention toward short-form video rather than article links. A separate layoff-era decision also ended a project that would have given third-party fact-checkers more prominence on Facebook through comments atop articles.
The cuts matter because they affect both the organizations evaluating dubious content and the infrastructure used to observe how it spreads. Later coverage of Meta’s de-emphasis of political content and reshuffling of election-integrity staff makes this an early signal of a broader pullback rather than an isolated budget change.
First-order effects
News outlets performing WhatsApp misinformation checks face lower Meta-funded compensation, potentially narrowing the work they can sustain, including around elections.
Reduced CrowdTangle funding weakens support for a tool used to monitor content activity, affecting researchers and news organizations that rely on platform-data visibility.
Second-order effects
Election researchers and fact-checking partners may need to redirect limited resources toward fewer investigations or alternative monitoring tools as Meta reduces direct support.
The move reinforces incentives for publishers to treat Meta-funded news and integrity programs as less dependable, following Meta’s earlier consideration of lower publisher payments as it shifted away from news links.
Third-order effects
If this pattern persists, platform governance will rely less on externally funded journalism and third-party monitoring, concentrating more of the remaining oversight inside Meta’s own systems.
The resulting gap between platform distribution and independent scrutiny could become more consequential as Meta continues to reduce the prominence of political content; the scale of that effect depends on the access and resources available to outside researchers.
The trend: Meta is moving away from publisher-supported news, external fact-checking, and broad third-party visibility as it narrows its political-content and integrity commitments.
Meta Cuts Fact-Checking Efforts on WhatsApp as Elections Loom The company is reducing payments to news organizations that respond to complaints of misinformation on the encrypted messaging app. A 2020 study by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that…
Meta has reduced payments to organizations that fact-check WhatsApp misinformation. The development comes just months before elections are set to take place in tens of countries around the globe. https://www.theinformation.com/ ... It comes as Meta also fired most of its Facebo…
Meta is reducing payments to news organizations that fact check potential misinformation on WhatsApp, ahead of major elections this year. Scoop with @SylviaVarnham: https://www.theinformation.com/ ...
Scoop with @KalleyHuang: Meta is is reducing payments to news organizations that fact-check potential misinformation on WhatsApp, including around elections. https://www.theinformation.com/ ...
There is some irony in Meta suggesting that they are going to limit politics on Threads, when all they are really doing is making “political talk” cost a premium. How are we supposed to believe @mosseri when Meta still sells ads to politicians and political campaigns? …
I'm glad Casey pointed out that it's hard to know exactly what this policy will mean in practice. TikTok also discourages “politics” and says it's for “entertainment” but there's A LOT of hot button topics there.
Meta's retreat from news and politics in apps like Threads represent the end of an era. I wrote about the trade-offs at play — and the uncertainty about what comes next https://www.platformer.news/ ...
What constitutes “political” content on Instagram and Threads? It's an important question given Meta's recent announcement to “avoid recommending” such content to users. But it's a question that execs like @mosseri aren't providing clarity on. More in @cnnreliablesources: http…
A lot of discussion recently over how Meta handles political content given their recent announcement that it won't be recommended on Threads. I explore the challenges of defining what is political, what has influenced those definitions in the past and how other platforms do it. …