/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A US judge dismissed AI copyright infringement claims against Midjourney and DeviantArt by three artists, but allowed a claim against Stability AI to proceed

While a federal judge advanced an infringement claim against Stability AI, he dismissed the rest of the lawsuit.

The Hollywood Reporter Winston Cho

Discussion

  • @paninid@mastodon.world @paninid@mastodon.world on mastodon
    This will change how artists and creatives produce and distribute their works.  —  Technology to “poison pill” art might just be the start.  —  @Techmeme
  • @jess_miers Jess Miers on x
    (Stability AI) Similarly fails — Judge demands facts re: Plaintiff's “compressed works” theory. Even then, Judge remains dubious: “Plaintiff's complaint is devoid of any allegations that [the artist's works] were used to create “fakes” of their work.” Dismissed / leave to amend […
  • @copyrightlately Aaron Moss on x
    The judge appears dubious of the notion that Stable Diffusion contains “compressed copies” of all of the training images, and unless plaintiffs can plausibly allege as much, there won't be a viable theory of direct infringement against users of the tool. 4/
  • @jess_miers Jess Miers on x
    Breaking: Judge Orrick dismissed most of the claims brought by the artists in Andersen v. Stability AI. This was an unsurprising result. Just because the technology is “new” doesn't mean we disregard current law. The claims were doomed regardless of AI.🧵https://acrobat.adobe.com/…
  • @robertfreundlaw Rob Freund on x
    Just in: Stability AI loses motion to dismiss artists' copyright infringement class action lawsuit: [image]
  • @copyrightlately Aaron Moss on x
    Reading the tea leaves, it's likely that plaintiffs' direct infringement claims are going to be limited to the copying of images to train Stable Diffusion in the first instance. 3/
  • @copyrightlately Aaron Moss on x
    Importantly, the court also appears to be quite skeptical of plaintiffs' theory that *all* output images are necessarily “derivative works” of all of the training images, and is likely to require allegations that 5/
  • r/singularity r on reddit
    Judge Dismisses Copyright Lawsuit By Artists Against AI Art Generators
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Judge Dismisses Copyright Lawsuit By Artists Against AI Art Generators