/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at Nightshade and Glaze, tools made by researchers at UChicago that help artists “poison” their work to confuse or break AI models that later train on it

A new tool lets artists add invisible changes to the pixels in their art before they upload it online so that if it's scraped …

MIT Technology Review Melissa Heikkilä

Context & Ripple Effects

UChicago’s image-perturbation approach followed an earlier free app aimed at protecting artists’ “artistic IP” through nearly imperceptible changes to uploaded work, establishing pixel-level defenses as an artist-controlled response to scraping.

The tools matter because they move that defense from a research concept toward practical use: Nightshade was later made available for Mac and PC, while Glaze drew strong demand even as researchers acknowledged its protections could be bypassed. Glaze’s demand and reported bypasses show both the appeal and limits of the approach.

First-order effects

  • Artists can alter images before posting them, creating a direct deterrent against models trained on scraped copies and giving creators a technical option independent of a platform’s permission settings.
  • AI developers that ingest public art face a higher risk that unvetted training data contains inputs intended to distort model behavior; Glaze separately targets imitation of an artist’s style.

Second-order effects

  • Dataset builders and model developers have an incentive to tighten provenance, filtering, and training-data review rather than treat publicly accessible artwork as frictionless input.
  • The reported ability to bypass Glaze’s protections turns creator defense into an iterative contest: adoption can prompt countermeasures, while bypasses can reduce confidence in one-time technical safeguards.

Third-order effects

  • If these tools gain sustained use, consent and data provenance may become more important competitive and governance boundaries in generative-AI training, rather than issues addressed only after models are released.
  • The pattern points to a continuing arms race between protective transformations and model-training pipelines; technical defenses may complement, but are unlikely by themselves to settle, disputes over artists’ work.

The trend: Generative-AI training is creating a new enforcement layer in which creators use technical controls to contest the reuse of publicly posted data.

Discussion

  • @itzmoepi @itzmoepi on x
    A massive thanks to the Glaze team for taking the initiative to help artists against exploitative theft. They released a new tool, Nightshade, that causes models to output something different (eg. a “cat” when prompted for “dog").
  • @jasonappledp Jason Coleman Apple on x
    The year is 2023. Artists turn to roofie-ing robots to survive.
  • @katriaraden @katriaraden on x
    Artists, best tool we could have asked for to fight this unprecedented exploitation of our labor is here! Coming from the creators of @TheGlazeProject, Nightshade lets us poison datasets, damage models and teach AI companies to ask for permission first. https://www.technologyrevi…
  • @theglazeproject @theglazeproject on x
    By now, I'm guessing most have already seen the news on our new project, Nightshade. Lots of artists sharing it, but here's the article from MIT Technology Review (thank you to the wonderful @Melissahei), and a thread explaining its goals and design. https://www.technologyreview.…
  • @neilturkewitz Neil Turkewitz on x
    If ⁦@Melissahei⁩ & @ravenben⁩ are in a single story, you know it's going to be good! “Poisoned data samples can manipulate models into learning, for example, that images of hats are cakes & images of handbags are toasters.” Why always toasters? 😊 https://www.technologyreview.com/…
  • @rahll @rahll on x
    From @ravenben's @TheGlazeProject at @UChicagoCS, Nightshade is a new tool that artists that will be able to use that poisons the datasets and models of genAI that scrapes work without consent. You wanted to know how we fight back? This is how. https://www.technologyreview.com/ .…
  • @theglazeproject @theglazeproject on x
    So now everyone knows why we've been so quiet for the last few weeks. With the webglaze update to v1.11 and Nightshade, that's why we're 1 month behind on Webglaze invite requests on twitter (sorry, we're working on it!)
  • @theglazeproject @theglazeproject on x
    It's worth noting that the MIT TR article includes a result that represents the “dumb” version of the attack. The optimized version that is Nightshade requires roughly 5X fewer samples to achieve the same result.
  • @palomamcclain Paloma McClain on x
    “Using it to “poison” this training data could damage future iterations of image-generating AI models, such as DALL-E, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, by rendering some of their outputs useless” We can turn our artwork into dataset landmines? LET'S GOOOOOOOO NIGHTSHADE!
  • r/IsaacArthur r on reddit
    Ignoring ethics will finally have at least small consequences.
  • r/artificial r on reddit
    New data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI
  • r/ArtistHate r on reddit
    This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI