/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Elliptic: total value of crypto laundered via decentralized exchanges, bridges, and coin swaps hits $7B; Lazarus Group was the top culprit, laundering $900M+

- Elliptic's new report shows $7 billion was laundered through decentralized exchanges (DEXs), cross-chain bridges and coin swaps.

The Block RT Watson

Context & Ripple Effects

The report extends Elliptic's earlier finding that RenBridge had processed more than $540 million in crime-related funds, shifting the focus from a single bridge to the combined laundering role of DEXs, bridges and coin-swap services.

It also sits within broader evidence that illicit crypto flows had increasingly reached DeFi: 2022 reporting recorded a rise in illicit transfers and record DeFi receipts. Naming Lazarus Group concentrates that broader pattern on a prominent alleged operator.

First-order effects

  • The $7 billion estimate makes decentralized exchange, bridge and swap pathways a defined compliance exposure rather than isolated infrastructure incidents.
  • Lazarus Group's $900 million-plus attribution gives investigators and service operators a concrete priority for tracing and screening related flows.

Second-order effects

  • DEX, bridge and swap operators face stronger pressure to detect cross-service transaction patterns, because laundering can span several products rather than end at one venue.
  • The findings reinforce a competitive divide between services that can support transaction monitoring and those whose decentralized design leaves counterparties with less visibility.

Third-order effects

  • If multi-service laundering remains persistent, crypto compliance will increasingly be judged at the level of connected transaction routes, not individual platforms.
  • That could deepen the crypto sector's concentration of illicit off-ramping around a smaller set of identifiable services, while leaving decentralized routing as a continuing legitimacy challenge.

The trend: Crypto crime monitoring is moving from identifying risky venues to mapping how illicit funds traverse interconnected decentralized infrastructure.