/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Tel Aviv-based Grip Security, which helps companies reduce their SaaS identity risk, raised a $41M Series B led by Third Point, taking its total funding to $66M

Frederic Lardinois / TechCrunch :

TechCrunch Frederic Lardinois

Context & Ripple Effects

Grip Security’s Series B follows its earlier $25M Series A for protecting data in SaaS apps, taking the company from initial venture backing to a larger funding round. The company is part of a Tel Aviv cohort addressing distinct SaaS-security exposure points, including SaaS application security and SaaS supply-chain protection.

The financing matters because identity risk is being funded as a dedicated SaaS-security category, rather than appearing only as a feature within broader application-security products.

First-order effects

  • Grip Security gains $41M in new capital and reaches $66M in total funding; the report does not specify how the proceeds will be used.
  • Third Point leads the Series B, becoming the named lead backer for Grip’s next stage of development.

Second-order effects

  • Grip’s stronger funding base raises competitive pressure on adjacent SaaS-security vendors, including companies focused on application configuration and supply-chain security such as Valence Security’s SaaS supply-chain platform.
  • Buyers evaluating SaaS controls may encounter more specialized products aimed at different layers of access, data, and identity risk, increasing the need to distinguish overlapping tools.

Third-order effects

  • If comparable funding continues, SaaS security could remain segmented into specialist vendors around identity, application posture, and supply-chain exposure before the category consolidates.
  • The pattern points toward security architectures centered on controlling permissions and access across SaaS estates, though it is unclear which product boundaries will persist.

The trend: Specialist security vendors are attracting capital to manage the expanding identity and permission risks created by enterprise SaaS adoption.