/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Western Digital refused to answer questions about how its portable SanDisk Extreme SSDs might lose all the data; the company is being sued over data-loss issues

Eleven days ago, we sent these questions to Western Digital's head of PR and published them publicly on The Verge:

The Verge Sean Hollister

Context & Ripple Effects

Western Digital’s portable-storage exposure is tied to SanDisk, which it moved to acquire in a $19 billion SanDisk deal in 2015. The current dispute therefore reaches a consumer-facing product line central to that relationship.

The company had already disclosed a network security incident that took systems offline earlier in 2023. That is a separate issue, but together the episodes raise the stakes for how Western Digital communicates about data-related risks.

First-order effects

  • The lawsuit and unanswered questions put Western Digital’s handling of reported SanDisk Extreme SSD failures under immediate legal and reputational scrutiny.
  • Affected customers face uncertainty over the reliability of the portable drives and the company’s response to alleged data loss.

Second-order effects

  • Rival portable-storage vendors can differentiate on reliability assurances, recovery support, and clearer failure disclosures as buyers reassess product risk.
  • Retailers and enterprise buyers may press Western Digital for more explicit guidance, remedies, or validation around the affected product line.

Third-order effects

  • If hardware vendors repeatedly face claims tied to lost customer data, product reliability may be treated less as a warranty matter and more as a disclosure and liability issue.
  • The pattern could increase pressure for clearer communication about data-loss risks and remediation, though the litigation’s outcome will determine how far that pressure extends.

The trend: Consumer storage is becoming a data-liability category, where device failures and the quality of vendor disclosure can carry consequences beyond replacement hardware.

Discussion

  • @quinnypig Corey Quinn on x
    Wait, going completely non-responsive isn't the magic fix-all response?! AWS PR: [image]
  • @michaeltchong @michaeltchong on x
    “Stay away from #Sandisk #SSDs. And if you have one, make sure to back it up. This is a perfect #casestudy of poor #crisis #PR. 🙄 WD refused to answer our questions about its self-wiping SanDisk SSDs https://t.co/UtvvXfUtdL”
  • @stewcelliott @stewcelliott on x
    “I thought printer companies were evil (see the printers that won't let you scan without toner) but this is next level from Western Digital https://t.co/rYbC1SDsJH”
  • @verge @verge on x
    “Months later, the company has nothing to say for itself. https://t.co/beZ3cnufE9”
  • r/hardware r on reddit
    Arstechnica: SanDisk Extreme SSDs are “worthless,” multiple lawsuits against WD say
  • r/tech r on reddit
    WD refused to answer our questions about its self-wiping SanDisk SSDs