/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An analysis of eight AI commitments made by OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon, Anthropic, and Inflection to the White House, and their potential impact

Seven leading A.I. companies made eight promises about what they'll do with their technology.  Our columnist sizes up their potential impact.

New York Times Kevin Roose

Discussion

  • @timrudner @timrudner on x
    Pretty good and reasonably critical commentary on the White House's AI commitments by @kevinroose. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @cannellelily Lily-Cannelle Mathieu on x
    The US AI commitments look like empty pledges to me: way too broad and indeterminate, as outlined by this news article. And what about discriminatory biases and intra- and inter-national social justice challenges related to AI application and use? https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @jamesoliverinla James C. Oliver on x
    These “voluntary protections feel a lot like the “annual meetings to discuss technology” that the AMPTP offered the WGA. It can't hurt, but we still need something more substantial with enforcement mechanisms. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @justinhendrix Justin Hendrix on x
    “Overall, the White House's deal with A.I. companies seems more symbolic than substantive. There is no enforcement mechanism to make sure companies follow these commitments, and many of them reflect precautions that A.I. companies are already taking.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @samgregory Sam Gregory on x
    Watermarking and provenance to show when something is AI-made audiovisual is one commitment made by tech companies to White House. Let's take close read of that para of White House-AI companies commitments on trust, watermarking and provenance ( https://www.whitehouse.gov/... [im…