A US judge says Ripple's XRP sales to sophisticated investors violated securities law but that sales on exchanges were not offers of securities; XRP jumps 70%+
🚀 According to documents filed earlier today … Twitter: Brad Garlinghouse / @bgarlinghouse : We said in Dec 2020 that we were on the right side of the law, and will be on the right side of history. Thankful to everyone who helped us get to today's decision - one that is for all crypto innovation in the US. More to come. @watcherguru : BREAKING: 🇺🇸 US judge rules Ripple $XRP is not a security. Tom Emmer / @gopmajoritywhip : The Ripple case is a monumental development in establishing that a token is separate and distinct from an investment contract it may or may not be part of. Now, let's make it law. 👇 [image] @tier10k : [DB] Ripple Sales of XRP Do Not Constitute Offer of Investment Contracts: Judge @eleanorterrett : 🚨BREAKING: Judge Torres says
's Programmatic Sales, the Other Distributions, and Larsen's and Garlinghouse's sales of #XRP do NOT constitute investment contracts. Documents and details to come. @metalawman : Based on my quick read through, it looks like the only thing left for trial would be the claim that Larsen and Garlinghouse “aided and abetted” Ripple's Institutional Sales of XRP—which were the only sales the court found to violate the law. @jason : Congrats to the XRP team for getting away with half the crime! 😂😂😂 @cz_binance : It's less about winning or losing, it's about on the right side of the people. 🙏 Preston Byrne / @prestonjbyrne : Following Judge Torres' decision in SEC v. Ripple Labs, XRP is Schrodinger's Shitcoin: a security when sold to a VC, not a security when sold via programmatic means or by or to insiders. This is not a position the law will long tolerate David Sacks / @davidsacks : Big ruling for crypto. Colin Wilhelm / @colinwilhelm : “Further, the court rejected Ripple's fair notice argument, noting that the Howey test is clear and that claiming ignorance is not a defense to violating the securities laws. We'll continue to review the decision.” Does not guarantee an appeal, but leaves door open. Colin Wilhelm / @colinwilhelm : “...instead emphasizing that Howey and subsequent cases have held that a variety of tangible and intangible assets can serve as the subject of an investment contract.” 2/3 Colin Wilhelm / @colinwilhelm : SEC reaction to ruling in Ripple case: “The court agreed with the SEC that the Howey test governs the securities analysis of crypto transactions and rejected Ripple's made-up test as to what constitutes an investment contract,”... Leo Schwartz / @leomschwartz : I feel like a lot of people are missing this very important footnote from the Ripple case [image] Dan Primack / @danprimack : Flashback: Ripple CEO @bgarlinghouse: SEC lawsuit is “bad for crypto” in the U.S. https://www.axios.com/... Brad Garlinghouse / @bgarlinghouse : The most important part of this ruling: “XRP, as a digital token, is not in and of itself a “contract, transaction[,] or scheme” that embodies the Howey requirements of an investment contract.” This is a now a matter of law (not up for trial.) @meattc_ : court also rules a “speculative motive” by the purchaser of an asset is not enough to evidence and investment contract... AND BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T KNOW THEY WERE BUYING FROM RIPPLE, THEY DID NOT DERIVE THAT EXPECTATION FROM RIPPLE'S EFFORTS honestly this seems shaky lol [image] @meattc_ : Institutional sales of XRP to sophisticated investors satisfy Howey...but, who cares, because that can be covered under exemptions to registration under Reg D. [image] @meattc_ : Ripple ruling is linked below. Some critical items: https://www.docdroid.net/... @meattc_ : CRITICAL NOTE This is a ruling on a motion for summary judgement, NOT holding on the merits. So, grain of salt. @spreekaway : somehow have a feeling gary will be back to saying congress needs to act quickly with legislation to protect investors after 2 years of saying that the law was clear @arthurb : Common sense prevails. @hosseeb : Never thought I'd be so happy to see XRP ripping. This is an unqualified win for the industry, and now stands as legal precedent in the USA. Well done to the Ripple team for fighting this battle. 🫡 @aeyakovenko : source code, data and cryptographic messages between computers are protected speech, not property @autismcapital : [image] @spreekaway : airdrops are prolly safu. [image] @haydenzadams : 🦄we are so back🚀 @spreekaway : Mashinsky jailed Gary btfo Today was a good day [image] Adam Cochran / @adamscochran : Honestly, you can lose a lot of faith in a lot of US institutions, but the unpoliticized components of the American Judiciary are pretty fucking solid. An analysis of securities dividing programmatic vs institutional is a master stroke and exactly how this should work! @jesse_hynes : The Ripple SJ decision is in. Here is the broad summary. Will break down further: Institutional Sales by Ripple ARE investment contracts Programmatic Sales by Ripple ARE NOT investment contracts The court chooses to NOT address secondary market sales [image] @watcherguru : JUST IN: Ripple $XRP soars 30% after US judge rules it's not a security. [image] @metalawman : This is is a huge win for Larsen, Garlinghouse and the XRP community. 1. While the court rules that some of Ripple's “Institutional Sales” of XRP were investment contracts and thus, the sale of unregistered securities, 2. Ripple's sales of XRP to “Programmatic Buyers”... Miles Deutscher / @milesdeutscher : $XRP has officially been deemed NOT a security by a US judge. This is not only a big win for Ripple, but also the entire crypto community. Although precedent isn't strictly binding, it's a great indication that many other altcoins are also non-securities. Game on, Gensler. @whalewire : It was clear from Day 1 that SEC would lose their politically motivated and rigged lawsuit against #Ripple. As $XRP is deemed NOT a security by the court, this sets precedent for all other similar cases. It's not just a huge win for XRP, but the entire crypto industry! @tree_of_alpha : You're telling me XRP isn't even a security and this guy is trying to label ETH one? good luck lmao [image] Eleanor Terrett / @eleanorterrett : 🚨BREAKING: Judge Torres says @Ripple's sales of #XRP do NOT constitute investment contracts. Documents and details to come. [image] Forums: Hacker News : Ripple notches win in SEC case over XRP cryptocurrency r/btc : Breaking: Ripple suffers major loss in court, found guilty of breaking federal securities laws. Remaining claims not ruled on yet, and will proceed to trial. … r/Buttcoin : U.S. judge says SEC lawsuit vs Ripple Labs can proceed to trial on some claims
We said in Dec 2020 that we were on the right side of the law, and will be on the right side of history. Thankful to everyone who helped us get to today's decision - one that is for all crypto innovation in the US. More to come.
The Ripple case is a monumental development in establishing that a token is separate and distinct from an investment contract it may or may not be part of. Now, let's make it law. 👇 [image]
🚨BREAKING: Judge Torres says
's Programmatic Sales, the Other Distributions, and Larsen's and Garlinghouse's sales of #XRP do NOT constitute investment contracts. Documents and details to come.
Based on my quick read through, it looks like the only thing left for trial would be the claim that Larsen and Garlinghouse “aided and abetted” Ripple's Institutional Sales of XRP—which were the only sales the court found to violate the law.
Following Judge Torres' decision in SEC v. Ripple Labs, XRP is Schrodinger's Shitcoin: a security when sold to a VC, not a security when sold via programmatic means or by or to insiders. This is not a position the law will long tolerate
“Further, the court rejected Ripple's fair notice argument, noting that the Howey test is clear and that claiming ignorance is not a defense to violating the securities laws. We'll continue to review the decision.” Does not guarantee an appeal, but leaves door open.
“...instead emphasizing that Howey and subsequent cases have held that a variety of tangible and intangible assets can serve as the subject of an investment contract.” 2/3
SEC reaction to ruling in Ripple case: “The court agreed with the SEC that the Howey test governs the securities analysis of crypto transactions and rejected Ripple's made-up test as to what constitutes an investment contract,”...
The most important part of this ruling: “XRP, as a digital token, is not in and of itself a “contract, transaction[,] or scheme” that embodies the Howey requirements of an investment contract.” This is a now a matter of law (not up for trial.)
court also rules a “speculative motive” by the purchaser of an asset is not enough to evidence and investment contract... AND BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T KNOW THEY WERE BUYING FROM RIPPLE, THEY DID NOT DERIVE THAT EXPECTATION FROM RIPPLE'S EFFORTS honestly this seems shaky lol [image]
Institutional sales of XRP to sophisticated investors satisfy Howey...but, who cares, because that can be covered under exemptions to registration under Reg D. [image]
somehow have a feeling gary will be back to saying congress needs to act quickly with legislation to protect investors after 2 years of saying that the law was clear
Never thought I'd be so happy to see XRP ripping. This is an unqualified win for the industry, and now stands as legal precedent in the USA. Well done to the Ripple team for fighting this battle. 🫡
Honestly, you can lose a lot of faith in a lot of US institutions, but the unpoliticized components of the American Judiciary are pretty fucking solid. An analysis of securities dividing programmatic vs institutional is a master stroke and exactly how this should work!
The Ripple SJ decision is in. Here is the broad summary. Will break down further: Institutional Sales by Ripple ARE investment contracts Programmatic Sales by Ripple ARE NOT investment contracts The court chooses to NOT address secondary market sales [image]
This is is a huge win for Larsen, Garlinghouse and the XRP community. 1. While the court rules that some of Ripple's “Institutional Sales” of XRP were investment contracts and thus, the sale of unregistered securities, 2. Ripple's sales of XRP to “Programmatic Buyers”...
$XRP has officially been deemed NOT a security by a US judge. This is not only a big win for Ripple, but also the entire crypto community. Although precedent isn't strictly binding, it's a great indication that many other altcoins are also non-securities. Game on, Gensler.
It was clear from Day 1 that SEC would lose their politically motivated and rigged lawsuit against #Ripple. As $XRP is deemed NOT a security by the court, this sets precedent for all other similar cases. It's not just a huge win for XRP, but the entire crypto industry!
Breaking: Ripple suffers major loss in court, found guilty of breaking federal securities laws. Remaining claims not ruled on yet, and will proceed to trial. …