Discussion

• @timobrien Tim O'Brien on x

  “Meta's approach meant users leapfrogged the disorienting “now what?” moment that has blighted the sign-up process on other Twitter clones. That alone makes Threads a larger threat to Twitter than anything else we've seen so far.” https://www.bloomberg.com/...

• @kenberman Ken Berman on x

  @AdamSinger That article doesn't have a shred of evidence to back up its opinion. He literally just says “it's sterile” without a single example of how. (Reason: the app itself is fine (for a beta))

• @stokel Chris Stokel-Walker on x

  My review of Threads for @theipaper: it's sterile and dull - and run by Meta https://inews.co.uk/...

• @adamsinger Adam Singer on x

  I mean what did you expect? Posters don't use Instagram. It's travel influencers and the goldfish demo. Probably not ‘for’ you guys https://inews.co.uk/...

• @tim Tim Bradshaw on x

  in case there's anyone still here, here's what it's like over there https://www.ft.com/...

• @alexrkonrad Alex on threads

  is this a place where we capitalize words y/n

• @asilvr Alex Silver on threads

  lol remember when we all hated meta / facebook and now we're back at it with the new shiny toy

• @biminibabes @biminibabes on threads

  I feel like I'm back on the old blue bird but before it was taken over by bigots and venom 🥹 It feels good to be back

• @charmrummy @charmrummy on threads

  Which one cooler?  🧵🪡 A. Threader B. Threadist C. Threadhead D. Threadmate

• @sandofsky Ben Sandofsky on threads

  The pitch meeting for Threads: “It's Twitter but swap nazis for brands.”

• @timbradshaw Tim Bradshaw on threads

  Because the golden rule of every new social network is it starts off only talking about itself... https://www.ft.com/content/ae7dd329- 990a-41e0-8e3c-2dc54b443b78