/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at Dolby Atmos, supported by 15 music streaming services including Apple Music, which has heavily invested in Atmos, and the future of immersive audio

True believers in the immersive audio format say it could restore a musical appreciation lost to a generation that has come up during the streaming era.

New York Times Bob Mehr

Context & Ripple Effects

The Times' survey of Dolby Atmos lands at the midpoint of a deliberate build-out: Apple made lossless and Spatial Audio free to all subscribers in 2021, then followed with dedicated Spatial playlists and an Android rollout promise, and Bloomberg later reported plans to weight Atmos streams more heavily in royalties from 2024. Fifteen streaming services now carry the format, but Apple is the one spending to make it matter.

That matters because Apple has already shown it will use curation and metadata as competitive weapons rather than price — its classical app fixed discovery through Primephonic-derived metadata, and Atmos is the same playbook applied to sound quality. The open question the article probes is whether listeners actually want immersion or whether this remains a supplier-side push.

First-order effects

  • Artists and labels distributing to Apple Music now have a direct financial reason to commission Atmos mixes once royalty weighting lands, turning immersive mixing from a prestige option into catalog hygiene.

Second-order effects

  • Competing services among the fifteen Atmos supporters face pressure to match Apple's playlist curation and promotion rather than just license the format, while Netflix's decision to gate spatial audio behind its Premium tier shows the format being used as a subscription upsell lever.

Third-order effects

  • If weighting-plus-curation proves it can move listening habits, immersive mixes become a default deliverable alongside stereo, reshaping studio and remixing work much as lossless did — though listener appetite on ordinary earbuds remains the unproven variable.

The trend: Streaming platforms are shifting from competing on catalog size to competing on format and metadata quality, with Apple using royalty design to force immersive audio adoption.

Discussion

  • @dolby @dolby on x
    When was the last time you listened to an album back-to-back 3-4 times? @nytimes' Bob Mehr investigates music's next chapter - #DolbyAtmos - and how it could restore an appreciation for music lost to a generation that has come up during the streaming era. https://dolbylabs.co/...
  • @audiophilestyle @audiophilestyle on x
    A great article about ⁦@Dolby Atmos music⁩ via ⁦@nytimes⁩ https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @bennjordan Benn Jordan on x
    Did you, at any point, consider trying any of these consumer ATMOS soundbar devices? Or looking into Apple's deal with Dolby and Apple tweaking standards before an album even comes out? Or other object-orented formats? @BobMehr https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @nytimesarts @nytimesarts on x
    “When I was a teenager, I used to listen to an album three, four times through just sitting in front of my speakers, entranced,” the veteran producer Bob Clearmountain said. He and others are hoping Dolby Atmos can bring that back. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @nytimestech @nytimestech on x
    There have been efforts to convince the public to adopt advanced audio technologies in the past six decades — including Quadraphonic sound in the '70s and 5.1 surround sound in the '90s — but with little success. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @mehpatrol @mehpatrol on x
    A story that answers the question: So what's the deal with Dolby Atmos? @BobMehr explains the technology, the stakes for Apple (who is invested heavily in it) and how artists and producers are feeling about the sound (and the influx of work): https://www.nytimes.com/...