/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at media coverage of generative AI over the past six months, as journalists and academics criticize the hype and provide ways to improve reporting

The Tow Center looked at how news organizations have been covering generative AI over the past six months. Tweets: @emilymbender , @emilymbender , @emilymbender , @janebsinger , @emilymbender , @datadhrumil , and @venkatananth See also Mediagazer Tweets: @emilymbender : @geoffreyhinton To the media: Wow is it a bad look that one old white guy comes out belatedly saying “AI is bad!” and you fawn all over him, while failing to connect with the scholars (mostly not white men) who have been documenting the actual problems with “AI”. >> @emilymbender : But more to the point: How is it that media reporting on Hinton's sudden switch to “warning” so often forgets to ask who else has been talking about dangers of this technology and what in particular have they been warning of? >> @emilymbender : You could even use Hinton's “realization” as a hook and then pivot to: @ruha9 @safiyanoble @mathbabedotorg @schock @csdoctorsister @rajiinio @Abebab @mer__edith & ofc @timnitgebru and @mmitchell_ai, who were fired by Google over our paper discussing the dangers of LLMs.>> Jane Singer / @janebsinger : ‘Hype cycle’: US media coverage of generative AI has tended toward the alarmist and the anthropomorphic. Experts say some important issues are being ignored, including those of governance, ethics and training — plus, of course, power and money. https://www.cjr.org/... @TowCenter @emilymbender : The way that the media are fawning over @geoffreyhinton 's supposed “whistleblowing” is just appalling. Here's the latest from @BobbyAllyn at NPR: https://www.npr.org/... & a short dissection: >> Dhrumil Mehta / @datadhrumil : A look at the last six months of chatbot coverage: “It's the Hollywood-ification of the public's understanding of AI,” says @ndiakopoulos “Newsrooms should lay down ground rules, perhaps in their style guides,” suggests @parismartineau https://www.cjr.org/... Venkat Ananth / @venkatananth : a good read on how the media is covering chatGPT six months into its launch. well, chatbots are the new 2021 bitcoin in terms of coverage (hardly surprising, considering we are in a hype cycle!) https://www.cjr.org/... [image] See also Mediagazer

Columbia Journalism Review

Discussion

  • @emilymbender @emilymbender on x
    @geoffreyhinton To the media: Wow is it a bad look that one old white guy comes out belatedly saying “AI is bad!” and you fawn all over him, while failing to connect with the scholars (mostly not white men) who have been documenting the actual problems with “AI”. >>
  • @emilymbender @emilymbender on x
    But more to the point: How is it that media reporting on Hinton's sudden switch to “warning” so often forgets to ask who else has been talking about dangers of this technology and what in particular have they been warning of? >>
  • @emilymbender @emilymbender on x
    You could even use Hinton's “realization” as a hook and then pivot to: @ruha9 @safiyanoble @mathbabedotorg @schock @csdoctorsister @rajiinio @Abebab @mer__edith & ofc @timnitgebru and @mmitchell_ai, who were fired by Google over our paper discussing the dangers of LLMs.>>
  • @janebsinger Jane Singer on x
    ‘Hype cycle’: US media coverage of generative AI has tended toward the alarmist and the anthropomorphic. Experts say some important issues are being ignored, including those of governance, ethics and training — plus, of course, power and money. https://www.cjr.org/... @TowCenter
  • @emilymbender @emilymbender on x
    The way that the media are fawning over @geoffreyhinton 's supposed “whistleblowing” is just appalling. Here's the latest from @BobbyAllyn at NPR: https://www.npr.org/... & a short dissection: >>
  • @datadhrumil Dhrumil Mehta on x
    A look at the last six months of chatbot coverage: “It's the Hollywood-ification of the public's understanding of AI,” says @ndiakopoulos “Newsrooms should lay down ground rules, perhaps in their style guides,” suggests @parismartineau https://www.cjr.org/...
  • @venkatananth Venkat Ananth on x
    a good read on how the media is covering chatGPT six months into its launch. well, chatbots are the new 2021 bitcoin in terms of coverage (hardly surprising, considering we are in a hype cycle!) https://www.cjr.org/... [image]