/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, President Greg Brockman, and Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever say the world will likely need a regulatory body for superintelligence

Now is a good time to start thinking about the governance … Stephen E. Arnold / Beyond Search : Please, World, Please, Regulate AI. Oh, Come Now, You Silly Goose Hasan Chowdhury / Insider : ChatGPT's makers say AI could surpass humanity within the next 10 years as ‘superintelligence’ starts to exceed other powerful technologies Chris Taylor / Mashable : OpenAI calling for AI regulation is a solid step in no direction Marvie Basilan / International Business Times : OpenAI's Altman Wants International Body Akin To Nuclear Watchdog IAEA To Regulate AI Aman Gupta / Livemint : ChatGPT's parent OpenAI wants humans to regulate AI, proposes a regulatory body Victoria Fakiya / Techpoint Africa : Wangiri phone scam is reportedly back in Kenya LinkedIn: Allan Thygesen : AI regulation is clearly coming.  The EU already has multiple drafts in process.  And it is one of very few topics Democrats and Republicans can agree upon. … Tweets: @openai : Initial ideas for governance of superintelligence, including forming an international oversight organization for future AI systems much more capable than any today: https://openai.com/... Sam Altman / @sama : something like an IAEA for advanced AI is worth considering, and the shape of the tech may make it feasible: https://openai.com/... (and to make this harder to willfully misinterpret: it's important that any such regulation not constrain AI below a high capability threshold) Alex Banks / @thealexbanks : OpenAI just released their article on the ‘Governance of superintelligence’. “Within the next ten years, AI systems will exceed expert skill level in most domains.” Here's everything you need to know: [image] Eric Newcomer / @ericnewcomer : Will be interesting if the US can build an AI regulatory framework with China / if the industry pushes for that Parker / @pt : @EricNewcomer It took 12 years after Hiroshima to even form the IAEA. I don't think anyone involved is thinking on those kind of timelines. Tech can't conceive of geopolitical timelines. Eric Newcomer / @ericnewcomer : a key feature of the IAEA is that China and Russia are members https://twitter.com/... @horvatsrecko : Anyone who thinks this is a good idea should simply watch the forgotten old SF movie “Colossus: The Forbin Project” (1970) https://openai.com/... Ian Hogarth / @soundboy : OpenAI describing a CERN-like project that major labs like Anthropic, DeepMind and OpenAI could combine into: “major governments around the world could set up a project that many current efforts become part of” https://openai.com/... [image] Mark Riedl / @mark_riedl : What capabilities are being referred to? What is a safe versus unsafe behavior? https://openai.com/... Elon Musk / @elonmusk : @JosephJacks_ 🎯 @josephjacks_ : [image] @drnicka : The hype game becomes the regulatory capture game. https://openai.com/... @josephjacks_ : “Open Source is great, as long as it doesn't exceed our latest released capability” 😂 Kate Devlin / @drkatedevlin : My fav part of Open AI's statement on the governance of superintelligence was the bit that said “major govts around the world could set up a project that many current efforts become part of.” Yeah, good luck. Maybe talk to the autonomous weapons folks about how that's going. Alexandros Marinos / @alexandrosm : Aaand just like clockwork, openAI asks for a global authority to regulate AIs with advanced capabilities. Such an agency, if effective, would freeze the status quo in place. What they don't tell us is how they define capability levels in a way that doesn't break goodhart's law. https://twitter.com/... [image] Jeffrey Ladish / @jeffladish : OpenAI just wrote up their plans for how they would like to develop superintelligent AI, and why they think we can't stop development right now. I'd summarize their approach as “let's proceed to superintelligence with global oversight https://openai.com/... Timothy B. Lee / @binarybits : Does this page have a link to a PDF I'm missing? I was expecting an OpenAI post titled “Governance of superintelligence” to offer some details on their thinking but it's like they wrote the intro and then forgot to write the rest. https://openai.com/... Preston Byrne / @prestonjbyrne : Does code have a governance body? https://twitter.com/... Perry E. Metzger / @perrymetzger : International regulatory regimes are a great way to stop development of technologies but a truly lousy way to keep anything you care about being developed alive outside of military research. Do we really want the only use of AI to be killing people? https://twitter.com/... Fabio Chiusi / @fabiochiusi : “future AI systems dramatically more capable than even AGI” 🤔 https://openai.com/... Greg Brockman / @gdb : Initial thoughts on superintelligence governance. International coordination will be key: https://twitter.com/...

TechCrunch Devin Coldewey

Discussion

  • @openai @openai on x
    Initial ideas for governance of superintelligence, including forming an international oversight organization for future AI systems much more capable than any today: https://openai.com/...
  • @sama Sam Altman on x
    something like an IAEA for advanced AI is worth considering, and the shape of the tech may make it feasible: https://openai.com/... (and to make this harder to willfully misinterpret: it's important that any such regulation not constrain AI below a high capability threshold)
  • @thealexbanks Alex Banks on x
    OpenAI just released their article on the ‘Governance of superintelligence’. “Within the next ten years, AI systems will exceed expert skill level in most domains.” Here's everything you need to know: [image]
  • @soundboy Ian Hogarth on x
    OpenAI describing a CERN-like project that major labs like Anthropic, DeepMind and OpenAI could combine into: “major governments around the world could set up a project that many current efforts become part of” https://openai.com/... [image]
  • @mark_riedl Mark Riedl on x
    What capabilities are being referred to? What is a safe versus unsafe behavior? https://openai.com/...
  • @elonmusk Elon Musk on x
    @JosephJacks_ 🎯
  • @josephjacks_ @josephjacks_ on x
    [image]
  • @alexandrosm Alexandros Marinos on x
    Aaand just like clockwork, openAI asks for a global authority to regulate AIs with advanced capabilities. Such an agency, if effective, would freeze the status quo in place. What they don't tell us is how they define capability levels in a way that doesn't break goodhart's law. h…
  • @drnicka @drnicka on x
    The hype game becomes the regulatory capture game. https://openai.com/...
  • @josephjacks_ @josephjacks_ on x
    “Open Source is great, as long as it doesn't exceed our latest released capability” 😂
  • @drkatedevlin Kate Devlin on x
    My fav part of Open AI's statement on the governance of superintelligence was the bit that said “major govts around the world could set up a project that many current efforts become part of.” Yeah, good luck. Maybe talk to the autonomous weapons folks about how that's going.
  • @jeffladish Jeffrey Ladish on x
    OpenAI just wrote up their plans for how they would like to develop superintelligent AI, and why they think we can't stop development right now. I'd summarize their approach as “let's proceed to superintelligence with global oversight https://openai.com/...
  • @binarybits Timothy B. Lee on x
    Does this page have a link to a PDF I'm missing? I was expecting an OpenAI post titled “Governance of superintelligence” to offer some details on their thinking but it's like they wrote the intro and then forgot to write the rest. https://openai.com/...
  • @prestonjbyrne Preston Byrne on x
    Does code have a governance body? https://twitter.com/...
  • @perrymetzger Perry E. Metzger on x
    International regulatory regimes are a great way to stop development of technologies but a truly lousy way to keep anything you care about being developed alive outside of military research. Do we really want the only use of AI to be killing people? https://twitter.com/...
  • @fabiochiusi Fabio Chiusi on x
    “future AI systems dramatically more capable than even AGI” 🤔 https://openai.com/...
  • @gdb Greg Brockman on x
    Initial thoughts on superintelligence governance. International coordination will be key: https://twitter.com/...