/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The EU fines Meta €1.2B over sending European user data to the US, a record GDPR fine, and orders Meta to stop transfers and delete the data within six months

Decision places pressure on Washington to implement surveillance changes for Europe to allow Meta to keep the data spigot open

Wall Street Journal Sam Schechner

Discussion

  • @wolfiechristl Wolfie Christl on x
    Max Schrems and his tiny nonprofit NOYB deserve limitless praise for their extraordinary persistence and achievements. But it's a shame for EU policy that GDPR enforcement against big tech and in the broader digital economy relies on a nonprofit and that much of it fails so hard.
  • @berinszoka Berin Szóka on x
    Meta was fined for being a 🇺🇸 company that the 🇺🇸 government could spy on Every 🇺🇸 company risks huge fines. Worse, unless 🇪🇺 quickly determines that 🇺🇸 data protection law is now “adequate,” 🇺🇸 tech companies will stop “processing” 🇪🇺 data—serving 🇪🇺 users 🪦open 🌐 Internet https…
  • @jamestitcomb James Titcomb on x
    Punchy response by Nick Clegg to Meta's €1.2bn GDPR fine “The internet risks being carved up into national and regional silos, restricting the global economy and leaving citizens in different countries unable to access many of the shared services we have come to rely on.”
  • @adamkovac Adam Kovacevich on x
    As I said when this was reported last week, this is like fining someone for jaywalking while city planners repaint the crosswalk, all while a thousand other people cross at the same spot. The Irish Court has weaponized the law against FB even as a US-EU agreement on data is... ht…
  • @markscott82 Mark Scott on x
    Boom — record 1.2 BILLION euro fine for @meta under Europe's privacy rules. Takes collective fines under #GDPR to just under 4 billion euros since regime started in 2018. FWIW, that's less than @FTC's $5 billion fine against Facebook https://www.politico.eu/...
  • @anupamchander Anupam Chander on x
    The largest data protection fine in EU history stems from the transfer of data across borders—to the US—with no showing of any ongoing access by impermissible third parties (such as the NSA) beyond that in Snowden disclosures or any deceptive use of information by Meta. 1/
  • @progresschamber @progresschamber on x
    EU courts struck down an EU-US data flow agreement. As the EU and US finalize a new agreement, an EU court is weaponizing the law against Meta for data practices in the interim. It's no mystery why the best tech firms have their home in the US, not the EU https://www.nytimes.com/…
  • @nickclegg Nick Clegg on x
    Today's @DPCIreland decision is not about one company's privacy practices - there is a fundamental conflict of law between the US government's rules on access to data & European privacy rights, which policymakers are expected to resolve in the summer. See our blog here:... https:…
  • @vmanancourt Vincent Manancourt on x
    This is the latest EU privacy fine that's been significantly boosted and altered by the European Data Protection Board, the bloc's privacy regulator umbrella body. Are we seeing the de facto centralisation of GDPR enforcement in cross-border cases involving Big Tech? https://twit…
  • @lukolejnik Lukasz Olejnik on x
    The clock counter on Facebook is now ticking. #GDPR https://www.tickcounter.com/ ... [image]
  • @liamherrick Liam Herrick on x
    noyb win: € 1.2 billion fine against Meta over EU-US data transfers. Worth looking at noyb account of how this decision finally came about... https://noyb.eu/...
  • @adam_tooze Adam Tooze on x
    Facebook owner Meta Platforms META was fined $1.3 billion by European Union regulators for sending user information to the U.S. -> increase pressure on US to conclude a data protection/sharing deal with the EU. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @johnnyryan Johnny Ryan on x
    I spoke to The New York Tomes' @satariano about the big problem for Meta after today's decision. Not the fine. https://www.nytimes.com/... [image]
  • @lukolejnik Lukasz Olejnik on x
    Six months. That's how much time Facebook/Meta has to adapt to the decision. If they don't (or the EU doesn't get along with the US) - Facebook/Instagram will have to be shut down in Europe. Facebook a hostage in the negotiations between the European Union and the US? #GDPR https…
  • @smashdawg Jeremy Kaplan on x
    Wow an enormous slap in the face(book) ... and a repudiation of the traditional borderless flow of data on the Internet. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @sophiaignatidou Sophia Ignatidou on x
    GDPR breaches relate to how data is processed. Evidence of harm may make the implications of these violations more easy to digest by the public (& they probably mean we spotted them too late), but the violations themselves should lead to regulatory action: https://www.theguardian…
  • @jangles Neville Hobson on x
    Can they collect, though? Plus FB will appeal so this will drag on for months if not years. https://twitter.com/...
  • @balbonipaolo Paolo Balboni on x
    It's interesting to note that “Given the seriousness of the infringement, the EDPB found that the starting point for calculation of the fine should be between 20% and 100% of the applicable legal maximum.” See https://edpb.europa.eu/... [image]
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    BAM. There it is, PAGE 253 of the order. Facebook has to delete all of its illegally collected EU data from storage. They're also being fined $1.3 BILLION but as I've said that's the insignificant hit to its surveillance capitalism business model. [image]
  • @samschech Sam Schechner on x
    In something of a test case, that led Ireland's privacy regulator in Sept. 2020 to issue a preliminary draft order for Meta to suspend Facebook's data transfers to the U.S.: https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @privacymatters @privacymatters on x
    2/ “EDPB instructs the @DPCIreland to include in its final decision an order for Meta IE to bring processing operations into compliance with Chapter V GDPR, by ceasing the unlawful processing, including storage, in the US of personal data of EEA users transferred in violation of
  • @joetidy Joe Tidy on x
    This is quite the graph.... https://twitter.com/... [image]
  • @samschech Sam Schechner on x
    This is part of a long-running saga over EU-US data transfers that could affect thousands of multinational companies, stemming from a 2020 EU court decision: https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @johnnyryan Johnny Ryan on x
    The Irish DPC's peers across Europe voted by majority to say “the Irish SA” (supervisory authority) failed to comply with the GDPR by refusing to tell Meta to ban the unlawfully transferred data. Paragraph 278 of EDPB Decision. [image]
  • @eu_edpb @eu_edpb on x
    Following the EDPB's binding dispute resolution decision, Meta Platforms Ireland Limited was issued a 1.2 billion euro fine as a result of an inquiry into its Facebook service by the Irish DPA - the largest GDPR fine to date! Read all about it here: https://europa.eu/!p4VBjB [ima…
  • @noybeu @noybeu on x
    Today, a decade-long (2013 - 2023) case on Meta's involvement in US mass surveillance has lead to a first direct decision. Meta must stop any further transfers of European personal data to the United States, given that Meta is subject to US surveillance laws (like FISA 702).
  • @dpcireland @dpcireland on x
    Latest News: Data Protection Commission announces conclusion of inquiry into Meta Ireland https://www.dataprotection.ie/ ... [image]
  • @sgclark92 Sam Clark on x
    A crucial element of the orders is that they are about Meta's legal basis for transfers and storage. The Irish DPC has found that Meta does not have a legal basis for these activities, but once it does, it can in theory resume those activities.
  • @vmanancourt Vincent Manancourt on x
    And crucially, what will the EU's highest court think about this? The Irish privacy watchdog has already appealed previous decisions saying the EDPB is overstepping its jurisdiction. Remember that under the GDPR, Ireland is supposed to have a lead role in regulating tech cos.
  • @sgclark92 Sam Clark on x
    Worth looking out for some of Meta's other appeals against Irish enforcement, e.g. the WhatsApp 225 million euro fine. If it succeeds there - one of its arguments being that due process wasn't followed - that might spell bad news for the EDPB/DPC in this case.
  • @andymstone Andy Stone on x
    We will appeal the ruling - including the unjustified and unnecessary fine. https://about.fb.com/...
  • @johnnyryan Johnny Ryan on x
    Here is the text where the EDPB orders the Irish DPC to force Meta to delete data (p. 73 of EDPB decision) https://edpb.europa.eu/... [image]
  • @riptari @riptari on x
    EDPB binding decision on Fb data flows has now been published: https://edpb.europa.eu/...
  • @daveleebbg Dave Lee on x
    “Hanging in the balance are tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars in trade in industries such as advertising, artificial intelligence, human resources, and cloud services.” https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @noybeu @noybeu on x
    ❗Breaking ❗ noyb win: € 1.2 billion GDPR fine for Meta over US mass surveillance. Decision required 10 years and 3 court procedures against Irish DPC. https://noyb.eu/...
  • @markscott82 Mark Scott on x
    @Meta ... Can't get more clear than this: Europe's #privacy watchdogs “take the view that Meta IE committed the infringement at least with the highest degree of negligence and this has to be taken into account when deciding whether an administrative fine should be imposed.”
  • @deitaone @deitaone on x
    META PLATFORMS INC SHARES DOWN 0.6% PREMARKET AFTER REPORT META FINED $1.3 BLN BY EU OVER DATA TRANSFERS TO U.S. $META https://twitter.com/...
  • @metanewsemea @metanewsemea on x
    The ability for data to be transferred across borders is fundamental to how the global open internet works. Read Meta's response to the decision regarding EU-US data transfers here 👇https://about.fb.com/...
  • @gavreilly Gavan Reilly on x
    €1.2bn fine for Meta from the Data Protection Commission over unlawful transfer of European customer data to the United States. Biggest ever regulatory fine handed out by the Irish data watchdog. (Incidentally, that goes to the Irish exchequer...) https://www.dataprotection.ie/ .…
  • @1br0wn Ian Brown on x
    I'm baffled @DPCIreland thinks it not “appropriate, proportionate and necessary” to fine #Facebook ANYTHING for a major GDPR breach, now changed to €1.2bn thanks to the @eu_edpb; nor to require the deletion of data Facebook illegally transferred since 🤷‍♂️ https://www.dataprotect…
  • @sgclark92 Sam Clark on x
    The application for a stay will also be crucial. The appeals don't automatically suspend the orders, so Meta getting a stay will give it breathing room to wait for the EU-US DPF.
  • @markscott82 Mark Scott on x
    @Meta @FTC Worth remembering: Dublin did not want to impose a fine on @Meta. It only did so after other European #privacy regulators got involved. [image]
  • @riptari @riptari on x
    Goodness! Another selective leak of the fb data flows decision! We are being spoiled - assuming your interest is headline fines only 😋
  • @deitaone @deitaone on x
    Facebook Owner Meta Fined EUR1.2B for EU Privacy Violations Over Data Transfers to U.S. — Sources — WSJ EU Privacy Regulators Rule Meta Illegally Stored Data About EU Facebook Users on U.S. Soil — WSJ Decision Doesn't Apply Directly to Instagram, WhatsApp — WSJ $META
  • @markscott82 Mark Scott on x
    It's always fun when reporters don't respect embargoes.
  • @johnnyryan Johnny Ryan on x
    I spoke to The Guardian's @DanMilmo about the Meta decision. Even a billion+ Euro parking ticket is of no consequence to a company that earns many more billions by parking illegally. FB was fined $5B by the US FTC in 2019. Its stock rose the next day. https://www.theguardian.com/…
  • @markscott82 Mark Scott on x
    @Meta @FTC Fun fact: Ireland's @DPCIreland used @maxschrems and his repeated privacy complaints against @Google, which led to no fines, to argue that it shouldn't impose a fine on @Meta. So that's Dublin using arguably Europe's leading privacy campaigner as a reason why NOT to im…