Sources: Meta told political campaigns in March that the company reviews AI-generated images via its fact-checking program, which exempts candidates and parties
Oh this question is going to be on my mind for awhile ... Meta won't say if politicians can post AI-made fakes without warnings https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
And irrespective of whether Meta sends AI-generated images to fact-checkers (challenge: it's slower and they lack skills/tech on AI-images), or uses automation in-house (challenge: detection is faulty)... Houston we have a problem either way if volume of AI-generated images ↗️↗️
So far, Meta seem far more interested in monetizing AI than preventing the spread of disinformation on its platforms. This is an opportunity to be proactive on content moderation, and big social media companies are blowing it. @isaacstanbecker https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
When asked recently by campaigns, Facebook confirmed it's sending AI-generated fakes to its fact-checkers. That means politicians will be exempt from the rules. But the company won't say that directly... why not? https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...