/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Utah's bills restricting kids' social media use have galling civil-liberties concerns and hazy enforcement plans, and will likely face constitutional challenges

Most people seem to agree that something should be done to protect kids from what sure looks like an addictive product.

New Yorker Jay Caspian Kang

Discussion

  • @dgolumbia@mastodon.world David Golumbia on mastodon
    nuanced discussion: “two visions of #socialmedia are not mutually exclusive in any way.  Social media does seem uniquely harmful to young people, but it is also the way in which they express themselves & find friends & confidantes.” …
  • @newblackman Mark Anthony Neal on x
    ‘Most people seem to agree that something should be done to protect kids from what sure looks like an addictive product. But almost no one knows what that something is.’ https://www.newyorker.com/...
  • @jithinraj Jithin Raj on x
    Social media does seem uniquely harmful to young people, but it is also the way in which they express themselves and find friends and confidantes. https://www.newyorker.com/...
  • @efranz13 Elisa Franzetta Ware on x
    Most people seem to agree that something should be done to protect kids from what sure looks like an addictive product. But almost no one knows what that something is. https://www.newyorker.com/...
  • @jaycaspiankang Kang on x
    The civil liberties issues are very obvious. By restricting kids from what has now become not only the ‘town square’ but also the way in which they are informed of and comment on the world, you're violating all sorts of norms and laws https://twitter.com/...
  • @jaycaspiankang Kang on x
    The situation we seem to be in is that most parents would probably support some social media restrictions for their kids, but the logistics and the constitutional questions make it basically impossible. They aren't cigarettes; they also aren't public spaces. https://twitter.com/.…
  • @mzinshteyn Mikhail Zinshteyn on x
    Adults in Utah responding to the state ID requirement to use social media “will be much less likely to comment on anything, really, because they understand that their real identities have been linked to their accounts,” an ACLU official reasoned. https://www.newyorker.com/...
  • @katelyn_csulb Katelyn Nevarez on x
    https://www.newyorker.com/... With growing social platforms, it's important to acknowledge safety precautions with trends. Yet, with cases like banning TikTok, it's also important to allow kids to indulge into their creative/fun sides! It is conflicting, yet important. #BeachSMC
  • @varun_jain Varun Jain on x
    Bans can never work. Cigarettes 🚬 did not wane just because of bans. In the next few decades, instead, technology should evolve to make it natural for children to stay away from social media. All things wane, after a suitable amount of time. https://www.newyorker.com/...
  • @mepaynl Morgan Pōmaika'i Lee on x
    This does a good job of spelling out how this will actually look (and in doing so, gets into what the ramifications of this will actually mean) https://www.newyorker.com/...
  • @jaycaspiankang Kang on x
    Wrote about the case for banning kids from social media and a new law in Utah that will try to do just that. https://www.newyorker.com/...