/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

AI pioneer and UCSD professor Terry Sejnowski argues that AI chatbots are often prodded into producing strange results by the people who are using them

One of the pioneers of artificial intelligence argues that chatbots are often prodded into producing strange results by the people who are using them.

New York Times Cade Metz

Discussion

  • @cademetz Cade Metz on x
    When people chat with chatbots, they see what they want to see. A.I. pioneer Terry Sejnowski compares this to the Mirror of Erised in the Harry Potter books. The Mirror seems to provide truth. But really, it shows the desires of anyone who stares into it: https://www.nytimes.com/…
  • @scalzi John Scalzi on x
    The adage of “Garbage In, Garbage Out” is in play here, but, to be fair, not just in how people interface with these chatbots. It's also in the programming and in the data sets. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @ylecun Yann LeCun on x
    Entities that throw our deepest thoughts back at us: a common theme in fiction, from Shakespeare's The Tempest, to the 1950's space opera Forbidden Planet, Tarkovsky's 1972 film Solaris, and several others after that. https://twitter.com/...
  • @sfiscience @sfiscience on x
    “These systems are a reflection of humanity. They learn their skills by analyzing text that humans have posted to the internet. But that is not the only reason chatbots generate problematic language, said [SFI Prof] @MelMitchell1.” @CadeMetz writes on the funhouse mirror of #AI: …
  • @nytimestech @nytimestech on x
    The longer the conversation becomes, the more influence a user unwittingly has on what the chatbot is saying. If you want it to get angry, it gets angry, said Terry Sejnowski, a neuroscientist, psychologist and computer scientist. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @bxchen Brian X. Chen on x
    Nice reality check from @cademetz on just what is going on when A.I. chatbots seem to go haywire: https://www.nytimes.com/... They're mirroring the user.