/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

How a slowing digital ad market, Apple's ATT changes, tech companies' internal turmoil, weak content moderation, and more are contributing to a junk ad epidemic

written after Apple's new App Store ad format placed gambling ads next to gambling addiction apps — as the antecedent rebuttal to the NYT's piece this weekend that questions why, all of the sudden, ads seem less relevant. https://mobiledevmemo.com/... Sandeep Ramesh / @sandeepramesh : @Carnage4Life I'm yet to see ONE tangible benefit that people have experienced with Apple's improved ‘privacy’ experience, and no, Apple's search business revenue is not the benefit I'm looking for. Eric Seufert / @eric_seufert : I have some ideas. https://twitter.com/... Samuel Scott / @samueljscott : “Why are you seeing so many bad digital ads now?” Because in the online world, people think more about how to deliver and track ads rather than how to make good ones. https://www.nytimes.com/... Dean Eckles / @deaneckles : @PManchanda_ ... Of course there can be multiple causes here, and presumably the mix is different on Twitter than Instagram. But Apple's ATT clearly importantly affected targeting of direct-to-consumer ads on Instagram, with some DTC brands dramatically scaling back. Alex Kantrowitz / @kantrowitz : Is it me, or is it completely nuts that this article mentions Apple only once, and in the 15th paragraph! My goodness. https://www.nytimes.com/... @swodinsky : the nyt has never covered adtech particularly well, but this article is so.... weird! and boring! i'm very curious who this piece is *actually* written for https://twitter.com/... Peter Kafka / @pkafka : @matthewherper @tiffkhsu She does mention Apple briefly. Could probably spend more time on it but I do think the primary issue is overall weak ad market. But also Twitter's self-starter dumpster fire is so bad and so specific it seems almost wrong to include it in a price like this. https://twitter.com/... @nytimesbusiness : Scrolling past ads has rarely been enjoyable. But in recent months, people say the experience seems so much worse. In a shaky advertising market in an uncertain economy, ads that few people want to see suddenly seem to be everywhere. https://www.nytimes.com/... Dean Eckles / @deaneckles : @PManchanda_ ... Kind of odd that “privacy” changes don't get substantial attention here, which we have good reasons to think produce exactly this. Maybe you mentioned this @jessicayfong when speaking with @tiffkhsu, but it didn't make the cut... Steve Larkin / @stevielark : Isn't this just the obvious outcome of everyone becoming aware that the ability to microtarget ads is basically worthless https://www.nytimes.com/... Matthew Herper / @matthewherper : Curious about this. I thought one reason we were seeing so many bad ads is because of new limitations on ad targeting by Apple and Google. Not mentioned in this ⁦@tiffkhsu⁩ story. Am I off base? Cc: ⁦@pkafka⁩. https://www.nytimes.com/... Cynthia B. Meyers / @annehummert : No mention of concerns about brand safety—it's not just advertisers' concern about their ad appearing next to bad content, it's also about programmatic placement removing the effects of contextual advertising, which was the format of legacy media https://www.nytimes.com/... Chris Yandle, Ph.D. / @chrisyandle : I don't think I could have expressed the current social media ad experience any better. All we're missing is a Spirit Halloween. https://www.nytimes.com/... https://twitter.com/... Dean Eckles / @deaneckles : An interesting, if anecdotal, article on reductions in perceived ad relevance — but that notably only briefly mentions any tech/policy changes that have made ad targeting much more difficult in many cases! https://www.nytimes.com/... https://twitter.com/... Nu Wexler / @wexler : This story could use a few more paragraphs on Apple ATT. https://www.nytimes.com/... Peter C. Evans / @pevans_c : This article highlights the observation that there are many more ads on social media. However, ads are a negative network effect with predictable consequences. Flood a #platform and users will leave. The flywheel will slow and even go into reverse. https://www.nytimes.com/... @logorific2 : This is making me feel so old. People are complaining that ads are insufficiently targeted to them. Well Jesus Fucking Christ, maybe if you pay them 10 bucks a month they'll install spyware on your machine and cameras in your house to fix that? https://www.nytimes.com/... Brian Stelter / @brianstelter : >> @tiffkhsu writes: “Advancements in digital advertising technology were meant to improve users' experience... But lately, on several platforms, the opposite seems to be happening...” https://www.nytimes.com/... Matthew Greenfield / @mattgreenfield : Major social media platforms are now “like the mall in your hometown that used to be the good mall,” Mr. Richardson said: “But now there's no longer a Macy's there — it's just a calendar store and a place selling beepers.” https://www.nytimes.com/... See also Mediagazer

New York Times Tiffany Hsu

Discussion

  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on x
    After driving a lot of the moral outrage around “privacy” and online ads, the New York Times is shocked that eliminating ad targeting leads to worse ads. This is the privacy you craved. Why see ads for things you might like when you can see random junk instead? Thanks Apple ATT. …
  • @btshapir Brad Shapiro on x
    @deaneckles We estimate privacy change induced limitations on targeting reduce ad effectiveness considerably particularly for smaller scale advertisers. No surprise that ads seem less relevant when platforms have less information about what is relevant to you... https://papers.ss…
  • @kantrowitz Alex Kantrowitz on x
    Is it me, or is it completely nuts that this article mentions Apple only once, and in the 15th paragraph! My goodness. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @swodinsky @swodinsky on x
    the nyt has never covered adtech particularly well, but this article is so.... weird! and boring! i'm very curious who this piece is *actually* written for https://twitter.com/...
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    I'd present this article — written after Apple's new App Store ad format placed gambling ads next to gambling addiction apps — as the antecedent rebuttal to the NYT's piece this weekend that questions why, all of the sudden, ads seem less relevant. https://mobiledevmemo.com/...
  • @sandeepramesh Sandeep Ramesh on x
    @Carnage4Life I'm yet to see ONE tangible benefit that people have experienced with Apple's improved ‘privacy’ experience, and no, Apple's search business revenue is not the benefit I'm looking for.
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    I have some ideas. https://twitter.com/...
  • @nytimesbusiness @nytimesbusiness on x
    Scrolling past ads has rarely been enjoyable. But in recent months, people say the experience seems so much worse. In a shaky advertising market in an uncertain economy, ads that few people want to see suddenly seem to be everywhere. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @deaneckles Dean Eckles on x
    @PManchanda_ ... Kind of odd that “privacy” changes don't get substantial attention here, which we have good reasons to think produce exactly this. Maybe you mentioned this @jessicayfong when speaking with @tiffkhsu, but it didn't make the cut...
  • @samueljscott Samuel Scott on x
    “Why are you seeing so many bad digital ads now?” Because in the online world, people think more about how to deliver and track ads rather than how to make good ones. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @deaneckles Dean Eckles on x
    @PManchanda_ ... Of course there can be multiple causes here, and presumably the mix is different on Twitter than Instagram. But Apple's ATT clearly importantly affected targeting of direct-to-consumer ads on Instagram, with some DTC brands dramatically scaling back.
  • @pkafka Peter Kafka on x
    @matthewherper @tiffkhsu She does mention Apple briefly. Could probably spend more time on it but I do think the primary issue is overall weak ad market. But also Twitter's self-starter dumpster fire is so bad and so specific it seems almost wrong to include it in a price like th…
  • @stevielark Steve Larkin on x
    Isn't this just the obvious outcome of everyone becoming aware that the ability to microtarget ads is basically worthless https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @matthewherper Matthew Herper on x
    Curious about this. I thought one reason we were seeing so many bad ads is because of new limitations on ad targeting by Apple and Google. Not mentioned in this ⁦@tiffkhsu⁩ story. Am I off base? Cc: ⁦@pkafka⁩. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @annehummert Cynthia B. Meyers on x
    No mention of concerns about brand safety—it's not just advertisers' concern about their ad appearing next to bad content, it's also about programmatic placement removing the effects of contextual advertising, which was the format of legacy media https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @chrisyandle Chris Yandle, Ph.D. on x
    I don't think I could have expressed the current social media ad experience any better. All we're missing is a Spirit Halloween. https://www.nytimes.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @deaneckles Dean Eckles on x
    An interesting, if anecdotal, article on reductions in perceived ad relevance — but that notably only briefly mentions any tech/policy changes that have made ad targeting much more difficult in many cases! https://www.nytimes.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @wexler Nu Wexler on x
    This story could use a few more paragraphs on Apple ATT. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @pevans_c Peter C. Evans on x
    This article highlights the observation that there are many more ads on social media. However, ads are a negative network effect with predictable consequences. Flood a #platform and users will leave. The flywheel will slow and even go into reverse. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @logorific2 @logorific2 on x
    This is making me feel so old. People are complaining that ads are insufficiently targeted to them. Well Jesus Fucking Christ, maybe if you pay them 10 bucks a month they'll install spyware on your machine and cameras in your house to fix that? https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @brianstelter Brian Stelter on x
    >> @tiffkhsu writes: “Advancements in digital advertising technology were meant to improve users' experience... But lately, on several platforms, the opposite seems to be happening...” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @mattgreenfield Matthew Greenfield on x
    Major social media platforms are now “like the mall in your hometown that used to be the good mall,” Mr. Richardson said: “But now there's no longer a Macy's there — it's just a calendar store and a place selling beepers.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @glenngabe Glenn Gabe on x
    Amazon's advertising biz is still booming -> Meta's limited ad targeting options & Amazon's ad product investments are leading brands to shift their budgets to Amazon; Amazon's ad business grew 19% in Q4 and is a $38B annual business now: https://www.cnbc.com/... https://twitter.…
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on x
    Online advertising isn't one category. Amazon competes more with Google than with Meta. Using the example in the article, you go to Amazon & Google when you've decided to buy an alarm clock. An ad on IG/FB suggests buying one. They're different products https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @lorakolodny Lora Kolodny on x
    Amazon is a big competitive threat to Facebook (and really, to every other search & social media business) as ad targeting suffers... by @JonathanVanian @CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @onelikeapp @onelikeapp on x
    Amazon's ad business, which has catapulted to third among digital ad companies, grew 19% in the fourth quarter, while Facebook parent Meta reported its third straight drop in revenue By #CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @kjgillenwater K J Gillenwater on x
    Plus, Amazon ads are not that complicated. FB ads are hard to set up, difficult to figure out, and they reject ads all the time for the dumbest of things. Amazon is the latest threat to Facebook as ad targeting suffers https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @creemer14 @creemer14 on x
    Slow down /smaller growth pie fight? https://twitter.com/...
  • @mallik70 Mallik on x
    This is real.. $AMZN is doing really well on ad business and it makes social media ad based revenue making companies like $SNAP, $PINS look silly. https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @mattnavarra Matt Navarra on x
    Amazon is the latest threat to Facebook as ad targeting suffers https://www.cnbc.com/...