/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Science researchers are excited about AI chatbots like ChatGPT but apprehensive about their propensity to produce errors and misleading info on technical topics

Nature

Discussion

  • @erictopol Eric Topol on x
    The term “generative #AI” may be appropriate since #ChatGPT and LLMs are generating a helluva lot of biomedical articles 😉 https://www.nature.com/... @stokel @Richvn @Nature https://www.thelancet.com/... @KyleLam93 @LancetDigitalH https://www.thelancet.com/... https://twitter.com…
  • @richvn @richvn on x
    Fascinating to see how to use GPT-3 [ChatGPT's predecessor] to edit a scientific manuscript (adapted from @miltondp 's January preprint, for this @nature article about generative AI and science ) https://www.nature.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @curini @curini on x
    “What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science” well, there is no way back. Just a way ahead. Just try to be ready and smart for it. https://www.nature.com/...