Springer Nature, the world's largest academic publisher, doesn't let LLMs like ChatGPT be credited as an author but allows AI to help write papers, if disclosed
@ylecun Totally agree. I use ChatGPT in my latest book because why not. Full disclosure: I also use a calculator /computer for most applied math. And I also use a grammar checker for important emails and papers.
Banning ChatGPT for scientific writing is misguided. It's like banning calculators or spell checkers I find ChatGPT to be a very useful tool for generating a first version of a paragraph or refining an existing paragraph. I predict this policy will be “refined” in <1 yr. https://…
I don't see the point of ChatGPT being used to write a peer reviewed paper. What's the point of giving an author feedback on a document they didn't write? It's like being asked to give feedback on the search results after a person typed into Google. https://www.theverge.com/...
The debate of #ChatGPT as a co-author on research papers seems settled: @SpringerNature says it cannot be credited as an author as it cannot take responsibility for its writings. I think this is perfectly understandable reasoning. https://www.theverge.com/...