/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An AI-written “fact-checked” CNET article had major errors, leading CNET to add notes to almost all AI pieces saying they are being reviewed “for accuracy”

CNET is now letting an AI write articles for its site.  The problem?  It's kind of a moron. Tweets: @jon_christian and @jon_christian Tweets: Jon Christian / @jon_christian : CNET added this gigantic correction to one of its AI-generated articles after we reached out with some questions about its accuracy 🫠 https://twitter.com/... Jon Christian / @jon_christian : More striking to me, though: they also added this unusual disclaimer at the top of almost every single article the AI has published since November https://twitter.com/...

Futurism Jon Christian