/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

John Markoff on slow pace of automation, shorter term bets from VCs and government, future of transportation, AR as the next big platform, more

The Next Wave — A Conversation With John Markoff  —  This can't be the end of human evolution.  We have to go someplace else.  —  It's quite remarkable. Tweets: @philiped , @bigdata , @dangillmor , @cdixon , @hunterwalk , @johnolilly and @digiphile Tweets: Philip Elmer-DeWitt / @philiped : “It's remarkable and sad at the same time” John Markoff on the future of technology. Spooky. http://edge.org/... Ben Lorica / @bigdata : We haven't made any breakthroughs in planning & thinking: Great @edge conversation w/ @markoff http://edge.org/... http://twitter.com/... Dan Gillmor / @dangillmor : Read this to see why @markoff is still the best journalist in explaining how technology changes our world: http://edge.org/... Chris Dixon / @cdixon : “I'm fascinated to see what the next platform is going to be. It's totally up in the air” -@markoff http://edge.org/... Hunter Walk / @hunterwalk : Questions & analysis on “What is Next?” in our tech future from @markoff is quite good -> http://edge.org/... John Lilly / @johnolilly : Very very few who are as thoughtful about technology as @markoff. I'm going to read this one a couple of times. http://edge.org/... Alex Howard / @digiphile : “The notion of #science for science's sake is under assault."-@Markoff http://edge.org/... Cf. https://t.co/7fGsxhgCD2

Edge.org John Markoff

Context & Ripple Effects

This Edge conversation lands near the end of John Markoff's run as a New York Times technology reporter — he would leave the paper the following year after twenty-eight years, so it reads as one of his fuller public statements on where computing goes next. His core claims cut against the era's hype: the pace of automation is slow, and both venture capitalists and governments are placing shorter-term bets than that slow pace implies.

Why it matters now: the tension Markoff identifies — multi-year physical-world deployment versus impatient capital — is exactly what later coverage keeps circling. Ben Shneiderman's subsequent argument against full robotic automation offers the augmentation path that shorter capital cycles can actually fund, while the industrial-revolution framing of today's AI shift confirms the years-not-centuries tempo Markoff described.

First-order effects

  • Markoff's own observation puts VCs and governments on the wrong side of the timeline he sketches: if automation in areas like transportation advances slowly, shorter-term bets systematically underfund the long-cycle work that matters most.
  • His claim that augmented reality could be the next major platform reframes where the next platform fight happens — away from the screen-based ecosystems that absorbed the last cycle and toward overlaying computation on the physical world.

Second-order effects

  • Ben Lorica's response to the conversation — that no breakthroughs have arrived in planning and thinking — locates the binding constraint: capital chases applications faster than the cognitive foundations they depend on mature, widening the gap between funded demos and deployable automation.
  • Shneiderman's human-in-the-loop position gives funders a cheaper alternative to full autonomy: augmentation projects fit shorter investment horizons, pulling money away from the replace-the-human end of the spectrum.

Third-order effects

  • If Markoff's slow-automation read holds across cycles, displacement debates give way to design questions — who stays responsible, who supervises, who is liable — pushing regulators and ethicists toward augmentation-first frameworks rather than bans or acceleration.
  • A persistent mismatch between decade-scale deployment and short-horizon capital would leave physical automation dependent on whoever can hold a longer clock — governments, strategic investors, or incumbent operators — reshaping who owns the automation layer itself.

The trend: Automation deploys on decade-long timescales while venture and government capital keep shortening their horizons, and that gap — not the technology itself — sets the real pace of the transition.