Webnic Registrar Blamed for Hijack of Lenovo, Google Domains
Brian Krebs / Krebs on Security :
Context & Ripple Effects
The hijack report lands mid-crisis for Lenovo: days earlier the company disclosed that Superfish adware had been breaking HTTPS on its notebooks, and the very day before this story Lenovo.com itself was defaced, possibly by Lizard Squad. Brian Krebs now traces another prong of the pressure campaign to the registrar layer — domains belonging to both Lenovo and Google were moved through Webnic.
First-order effects
- Lenovo and Google face an attacker who can redirect or intercept mail and web traffic for their affected domains, forcing immediate recovery through the Webnic registrar relationship.
- Webnic's reputation as a custodian takes a direct hit, since the blame attaches to its account-transfer controls rather than to any flaw at Lenovo or Google themselves.
Second-order effects
- Domain owners are pushed to audit registrar security — transfer locks, authentication, support-channel verification — much as Zoho abandoned its own registrar TierraNet in 2018 after a phishing-complaint takedown it judged mishandled.
- Registrars handling high-value portfolios come under scrutiny as the softest link: the same pattern resurfaced in 2024 when researchers found a Squarespace flaw exploited to hijack domains, mostly crypto businesses migrated from Google Domains.
Third-order effects
- If registrar compromise keeps recurring across a decade — Webnic in 2015, TierraNet's customer loss in 2018, Squarespace in 2024 — the structural lesson is that concentrated domain custody makes single-registrar failures a systemic risk, pressuring the industry toward hardened transfer authentication as a competitive baseline.
- For brand owners like Lenovo, repeated attacks across product supply chain and web presence argue for treating domain infrastructure as part of security architecture rather than an IT afterthought — though how far buyers internalize that remains genuinely open.
The trend: Domain registrars are emerging as a decade-spanning weak point in corporate security, where one provider's control failures can hijack even the most security-conscious brands' web presence.